28.04.2021 Views

The Battle of Britain Five Months That Changed History, May—October 1940 by James Holland (z-lib.org).epub

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

allowing nothing to get in the way of that single goal: more aircraft. Red

tape was dispensed with; so too were niceties. If there was a bottleneck

anywhere, a senior member of MAP would be sent to the relevant factory

and whatever the problem – such as mismanagement, lack of workers,

shortage of parts – it would be assessed and resolved with extreme haste

and the bottleneck cleared. He got rid of Lord Nuffield, whom he

considered complacent and too full of his own importance, and sent Sir

Richard Fairey, the eminent aircraft designer, up to the new specially built

shadow factory at Castle Bromwich to assess why it was still not operating

effectively nearly two years after building work had begun. Fairey found

mismanagement was rife, that the workforce was slack, undisciplined and

often poorly trained, and that many of the machine tools were the wrong

ones for the job of building Spitfires. Paperwork was non-existent. The

place was, frankly, a shambles. Vickers took over the running of the factory

from Nuffield and matters soon began to improve. There would be no more

slackness, not at Castle Bromwich, nor at any other factory working for

MAP: workers were expected to toil seven days a week with a disregard for

all labour regulations. That was how Beaverbrook worked himself and he

expected everyone else to do the same. It was a wonder what could be

achieved when everyone involved was focused entirely on the main task in

hand.

But while new production figures were impressive, so too were those of

repaired aircraft. Repair and salvage of aircraft had been outsourced from

the RAF and was run by the Civilian Repair Organization (CRO), headed

by Lord Nuffield and managed by Morris Motors. Needless to say, Nuffield

went as soon as the Ministry of Aircraft Production took over. The principle

of the system was a good one, with a chain of Civilian Repair Units, which

were major repair workshops, but also depots at airfields, training schools

and other warehouses.

Beaverbrook took the existing set-up but quickly made a number of

changes. Before, aircraft damage had been categorized: 1, repairable by

squadron; 2, repairable by contractor or at depot; or 3, recommended for

parts salvage. Beaverbrook now re-categorized damage as 4, 5 or 6.

Category 4 applied to aircraft that could be repaired within thirty-six hours.

Category 5 was given to those aircraft safe to fly lightly, and which became

known as ‘fly-in’ repairs; if a category 5 aircraft was repairable within

twenty-four hours, for example, then the pilot could wait and fly it back.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!