21.04.2013 Views

ETTC'2003 - SEE

ETTC'2003 - SEE

ETTC'2003 - SEE

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

mimics from CCS ones. The objective is to be even more independent from the control center<br />

and to validate offline FCPs together with ground control mimics.<br />

4. Because testing is automatic, verifications are restricted to specified properties specified. In<br />

general, only the expected states are specified in procedures and not the forbidden ones. For<br />

instance, it is theoretically possible (though unlikely) that procedure execution leads to an<br />

unwanted on-board reconfiguration which is not seen through specified TM effects. To limit<br />

this risk, ground monitoring are systematically computed and checked. For SPOT5 satellite,<br />

more than 1200 ground monitoring were defined. A strong point of SINUS is to take into<br />

account the same monitoring as the ones checked by the ground control centre.<br />

9. Conclusion<br />

A new technique for the validation of Flight Control Procedures has been introduced for SPOT5<br />

satellite qualification. In order to gain all benefits of this new technique, it was particularly<br />

important to integrate it in our process. This new process was presented in this paper. It has already<br />

enabled to reduce FCP definition and validation cost.<br />

A main characteristic of automatic validation tool is that it is light, easy to use, requiring few<br />

facilities (a laptop running SINUS is sufficient to define and validate a FCP offline).<br />

The main use of this technique is during satellite qualification. But the use in operation is also<br />

important.<br />

Indeed, automatic validation tools improve operational staff reactivity: first to investigate after<br />

satellite anomalies; second to define or adapt and validate FCPs to enable, as soon as possible,<br />

mission recovery.<br />

Another important advantage of the approach is that it leads to a better formalisation of satellite<br />

Command/Control expertise. Operational and testing data are largely reusable for future satellite of<br />

the same product line (HELIOS 2). The difficulty is more organisational than technical : reuse such<br />

as automatic validation require to make existing processes and ways of doing evolve and it is not<br />

always well accepted.<br />

Abréviations<br />

CCS Satellite Ground Control Center (Centre de Contrôle Satellite)<br />

FCP Flight Control Procedure (also called Operational Procedure)<br />

SINUS Satellite Numeric Simulator (Simulateur Numérique Satellite)<br />

TM / TC Telemetry / TeleCommand<br />

Références<br />

[Lloret] Automatic Validation of Operational Procedures<br />

J.C. Lloret, N. Champsavoir. DASIA 2002<br />

[Sinus] Manuel utilisateur du logiciel Sinus, ed 01 rév 1<br />

CNES, réf. C2.MU.0H3.862.CN<br />

9

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!