21.04.2013 Views

ETTC'2003 - SEE

ETTC'2003 - SEE

ETTC'2003 - SEE

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

3.2 Analysis of the contribution<br />

There is a general trend for all these measurement; there is an additional gain<br />

slope.<br />

The elapsed time of this measurement is 20 minutes, for 44 points of<br />

measurement.<br />

Perturbations could have several origins:<br />

- Propagation: variations of propagation conditions in the atmosphere may<br />

change during the measurement duration. The higher the frequency, the<br />

larger the contribution.<br />

- Motion of the satellite combined with antennas gain slope : this results in<br />

a modification of the payload antenna pointing to the ground station<br />

direction. Its effect depends on the location of the IOT station within the<br />

Satellite antenna diagrams.<br />

- Ground station stability: thermal RF ground chain stability, antennapointing<br />

stability, and measurement equipment stability…<br />

- Satellite temperature: RF gain chain during the elapsed time<br />

The previous In Orbit Tests have all presented a dispersion of 0.25 dB to 0,5 dB<br />

for 3 MHz until 30 MHz bandwidth filter.<br />

3.3 Advantage of the new IOT Gain flatness Measurement method<br />

This new method allows to compensate all these medium-term drifts affecting<br />

the measurement conditions.<br />

Realtive Level (dB)<br />

Comparison of ambient result and proposed IOT method<br />

1<br />

0,5<br />

0<br />

-2 -1,5 -1 -0,5 0 0,5 1 1,5 2<br />

-0,5<br />

-1<br />

-1,5<br />

-2<br />

Frequency Offset (MHz)<br />

-9-<br />

New method<br />

Ambient result<br />

Figure 9 Comparison of ambient ground test result with IOT proposed method

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!