21.04.2013 Views

ETTC'2003 - SEE

ETTC'2003 - SEE

ETTC'2003 - SEE

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

detector, synchronous decorrelation multiuser detector and conventional detector. It is seen from<br />

it that the output SNR of conventional detector (without cancellation of MAI) degrades quickly<br />

along with the active users increase. When the system has few users, the conventional detector has<br />

better performance than the Quasi-synchronous multiuser detector because the new noise vector of<br />

R -1. N is introduction. When the number of users increase, the DF of the conventional detector<br />

increase significantly, the DF of the Quasi-synchronous multiuser detector and the synchronous<br />

decorrelation multiuser detector almost keep a constant. It’s shown that the output SNR<br />

degradation of the Quasi-synchronous multiuser detector is larger 0.8dB and 1.7dB than the<br />

synchronous decorrelation multiuser detector for relative time delay tk=10Tc and tk=20Tc<br />

respectively, this is the cost of correlation time truncation.<br />

Fig.4 shows the output SNR as a<br />

function<br />

of relative time delay. Where<br />

the input SNR is 20 dB, the number of<br />

users is 20. We can know from Fig.4<br />

that the relative time delay varied<br />

from 10Tc to 20Tc, resulting the DF<br />

of the Quasi-synchronous multiuser<br />

detector is 0.8dB~1.7dB larger than<br />

that of the synchronous decorrelation<br />

multiuser detector, and the DF of<br />

conventional detector is 7 dB larger<br />

than that of the synchronous<br />

decorrelation multiuser detector.<br />

Conclusion:<br />

In the asynchronous<br />

DS/CDMA data transmission system, signal is transmitted<br />

synchronously<br />

and arrived to the reception station asynchronously. The Quasi-synchronous<br />

References:<br />

Fig.4 Output SNR vs. relative time delay<br />

multiuser detector can be used to reduce the computation complexity. It has good near-far<br />

resistance performance because it needn’t amplitude information of users. So in some telemetry<br />

System applications, The Quasi-synchronous multiuser detector is a good approach for multiuser<br />

detection.<br />

[1] B.G.Agee,K.Cohen,J.H.Reed,and<br />

T.C.Hsia “Simulation performance of a blind adaptive array<br />

for a realistic mobile channel” in proc, 43 rd VTC.pp197-100. 1993.<br />

[2] A.Naguib,A.Poulraj ,T.Kailath , “Capacity imporement with base-station<br />

antenna arrays in<br />

cellular CDMA”,IEEE Trans on VT.VOL. VT-43 pp691-698. 1994.<br />

[3] S.Verdu, “Minimum probability of error for synchronous Gaussian<br />

IEEE Trans. On IT ,VOL.IT-32.pp85-96.1986.<br />

multi-accsee channels”<br />

[4] R.Lupas and S.Verdu. “Linear Multiuser Detectors<br />

for Synchronous Code-Division<br />

Multiple-Access Channels” IEEE Trans. On IT. VOL.IT-35,No.1,pp123-136.1989。<br />

[5] R.Lupas and S.Verdu. “Near-far resistance of multiuser detector in asynchronous channels.”<br />

IEEE Trans. On COM. VOL.COM-38,No.4,pp496-508.1990.<br />

[6] Akihiro Kajiwara and Masao Nakagawa, “Microcellular CDMA<br />

System with a Linear

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!