21.04.2013 Views

ETTC'2003 - SEE

ETTC'2003 - SEE

ETTC'2003 - SEE

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Phase (deg); Magnitude (dB)<br />

To: Y(1)<br />

50<br />

0<br />

-50<br />

-100<br />

-50<br />

-100<br />

-150<br />

-200<br />

-250<br />

10 0<br />

-300<br />

10 1<br />

Bode Diagrams<br />

Frequency (rad/sec)<br />

ETTC2003 European Test and Telemetry Conference<br />

From: U(1)<br />

Figure 2 – Bode diagrams of the test-bench<br />

From this set of models, one is known as "nominal" and uncertainty<br />

domains supplement the representation in the Nichols chart system (Figure 3).<br />

0<br />

Magnitude<br />

( dB)<br />

40<br />

20<br />

-20<br />

-40<br />

-60<br />

Uncertainty domains<br />

Nominal plant<br />

-80<br />

-400 -350 -300 -250 -200 -150 -100 -50<br />

Phase (deg)<br />

Figure 3 – Nichols diagram of the nominal plant with uncertainty domains.<br />

The control law is then computed for the nominal model, but while taking<br />

into account of uncertainties in order to guarantee the stability and the<br />

performances of the linked system. Figure 4 shows an open-loop Nichols locus that<br />

tangents a magnitude contour and the uncertainty domains that are positioned<br />

compared to this contour in three different cases. For the cases (a) and (b), the<br />

uncertainty domains cross the magnitude contour, so performances guaranteed by<br />

the tangency of the contour (for example the overshoot of the response) are not<br />

achieved. On the other hand, for the case (c), the uncertainty domains are wellpositioned<br />

and performance may be guaranteed in spite of the uncertainties.<br />

10 2<br />

10 3

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!