28.02.2013 Aufrufe

Potentiale zur energetischen Nutzung von Biomasse in der ... - EPFL

Potentiale zur energetischen Nutzung von Biomasse in der ... - EPFL

Potentiale zur energetischen Nutzung von Biomasse in der ... - EPFL

MEHR ANZEIGEN
WENIGER ANZEIGEN

Sie wollen auch ein ePaper? Erhöhen Sie die Reichweite Ihrer Titel.

YUMPU macht aus Druck-PDFs automatisch weboptimierte ePaper, die Google liebt.

34<br />

of future production cost of the Fisher-Tropsch liquid biofuels was made on the basis of anticipated<br />

improvements <strong>in</strong> the overall plant operation efficiency, reduction of <strong>in</strong>vestment costs due to<br />

technological learn<strong>in</strong>g and <strong>in</strong>creased labour productivity. Because of limited availability of <strong>in</strong>digenous<br />

biomass resources <strong>in</strong> Switzerland, it is assumed that capacity of second and third generation Fischer-<br />

Tropsch plants would not be <strong>in</strong>creased compared to the first unit hypothetically commissioned <strong>in</strong><br />

2010 (400 MW th, <strong>in</strong>put ), hence a scale-up factor was not applied. Assumed variation factors of the ma<strong>in</strong><br />

components of FT liquid biofuels production cost are given <strong>in</strong> Table 4.<br />

2010 2025 2040<br />

Capital cost 1.00 0.80 0.65<br />

O&M costs 1.00 0.95 0.90<br />

Biomass (base case) 1.00 1.00 1.00<br />

Biomass (decreas<strong>in</strong>g cost) 0.90 0.80 0.70<br />

Table 4 Variation factors of future production cost of FT liquid biofuels.<br />

For the biomass price two cases were consi<strong>der</strong>ed: first one with constant prices throughout the study<br />

period and another one with decreas<strong>in</strong>g cost, which presume possibility for large scale/lower cost<br />

<strong>in</strong>digenous production of biomass energy crops and importation of low cost biomass from abroad.<br />

Presentation of the results<br />

As it is shown <strong>in</strong> Figure 4, the levelised production cost of Fischer-Tropsch liquid biofuels <strong>in</strong> case of<br />

constant prices of biomass is expected to decrease gradually from approx. 43.7 CHF/GJ (15.7<br />

cts/kWh th ) <strong>in</strong> 2010 to 38.9 CHF/GJ (14.0 cts/kWh th ) <strong>in</strong> 2040.<br />

cts / kWh th<br />

25.00<br />

20.00<br />

15.00<br />

10.00<br />

5.00<br />

0.00<br />

2010 2025 2040<br />

Fossil diesel Taxes<br />

Fossil diesel Production cost<br />

FT bio-diesel Biomass<br />

FT bio-diesel O&M cost<br />

FT bio-diesel Capital cost<br />

Figure 4 Comparison of FT liquid biofuels production cost with the price of fossil diesel (constant price<br />

of biomass).<br />

Meanwhile, the cost of conventional diesel (without taxes) is expected to grow up from 14.6 CHF/GJ<br />

(5.3 cts/kWh th ) <strong>in</strong> 2000 to 29.2 CHF/GJ (10.5 cts/kWh th ) <strong>in</strong> 2040. It means that even <strong>in</strong> the long run<br />

perspective there will be a significant gap between the production costs of FT liquid biofuels and their<br />

fossil analogues. Hence, un<strong>der</strong> the conditions of constant price of biomass, the production of liquid<br />

biofuels via Fischer-Tropsch technology would be economically viable only with tax exemption.

Hurra! Ihre Datei wurde hochgeladen und ist bereit für die Veröffentlichung.

Erfolgreich gespeichert!

Leider ist etwas schief gelaufen!