Potentiale zur energetischen Nutzung von Biomasse in der ... - EPFL
Potentiale zur energetischen Nutzung von Biomasse in der ... - EPFL
Potentiale zur energetischen Nutzung von Biomasse in der ... - EPFL
Sie wollen auch ein ePaper? Erhöhen Sie die Reichweite Ihrer Titel.
YUMPU macht aus Druck-PDFs automatisch weboptimierte ePaper, die Google liebt.
60<br />
Reference vehicle characteristics 2010 2025 2040<br />
Vehicle price (<strong>in</strong>cl. VAT) [CHF] 32’340 32’340 32’340<br />
Annual <strong>in</strong>vestment costs [CHF/yr] 04’250 04’250 04’250<br />
Ma<strong>in</strong>tenance costs [CHF/yr] 00’650 00’650 00’650<br />
Other costs (<strong>in</strong>surance, driv<strong>in</strong>g tax, etc.) [CHF/yr] 01’500 01’500 01’500<br />
Fuel specific consumption [l/100 km] 8.0 6.9 5.9<br />
Table 8 Ma<strong>in</strong> characteristics of the reference vehicle for 2010, 2025 and 2040.<br />
The price of the vehicle was consi<strong>der</strong>ed to rema<strong>in</strong> constant over the whole study period. Given a<br />
lifetime of 15 years (ARE, OFS, 2001) and an <strong>in</strong>terest rate of 10%, annual <strong>in</strong>vestment costs for the<br />
vehicle were calculated to be 4'250 CHF/yr. Annual ma<strong>in</strong>tenance costs were taken as 2% of the <strong>in</strong>itial<br />
cost of the vehicle, result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> 650 CHF/yr. Other costs (<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>surance, driv<strong>in</strong>g tax, etc.) were<br />
taken as 1'500 CHF/yr. The fuel specific consumption was consi<strong>der</strong>ed to be reduced from 8.0 l/100<br />
km <strong>in</strong> 2010 to 5.9 l/100 km <strong>in</strong> 2040. It was also assumed that the fuel consumption would be the<br />
same with gasol<strong>in</strong>e or E10.<br />
The annual distance travelled per vehicle was taken as 12'850 km/yr (ARE, OFS, 2001). In or<strong>der</strong> to<br />
take <strong>in</strong>to account distribution and retailers marg<strong>in</strong>s, an additional 0.05 CHF/l was applied to the<br />
production cost of bioethanol. It was assumed also that bioethanol used as a vehicle fuel would be<br />
free of tax. The price of E10 was taken as 0.1 times the price of bioethanol plus 0.9 times the price of<br />
gasol<strong>in</strong>e, as mix<strong>in</strong>g does not <strong>in</strong>volve any specific costs. F<strong>in</strong>ally, the price of gasol<strong>in</strong>e after 2040 was<br />
consi<strong>der</strong>ed to rema<strong>in</strong> constant. The overall results are given <strong>in</strong> CHF/100 km and presented <strong>in</strong> Table 9,<br />
with a dist<strong>in</strong>ction between vehicle, ma<strong>in</strong>tenance and fuel costs.<br />
Reference vehicle characteristics 2010 2025 2040<br />
- Vehicle costs [CHF/100 km] 33.1 33.1 33.1<br />
- Ma<strong>in</strong>tenance costs [CHF/100 km] 5.0 5.0 5.0<br />
- Fuel costs [CHF/100 km] 12.8 12.3 10.3<br />
- Other costs [CHF/100 km] 11.7 11.7 11.7<br />
Total [CHF/100 km] 62.6 62.1 60.1<br />
Gasol<strong>in</strong>e<br />
- Vehicle costs [CHF/100 km] 33.1 33.1 33.1<br />
- Ma<strong>in</strong>tenance costs [CHF/100 km] 5.0 5.0 5.0<br />
- Fuel costs [CHF/100 km] 12.9 12.7 10.8<br />
- Other costs [CHF/100 km] 11.7 11.7 11.7<br />
Total [CHF/100 km] 62.7 62.5 60.6<br />
- Vehicle costs [CHF/100 km] 33.1 33.1 33.1<br />
Table 9 Comparison of the economics of E10 and conventional gasol<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong> 2010, 2025 and 2040.<br />
It is important to bear <strong>in</strong> m<strong>in</strong>d that the results presented for 2010 and 2025 are dependent on the<br />
evolution of gasol<strong>in</strong>e prices over the lifetime of the vehicle (i.e. 15 years). It comes out from the results<br />
presented <strong>in</strong> Table 9, that E10 appears a little more advantageous than gasol<strong>in</strong>e, given the hypotheses<br />
on the evolution of oil price (INFRAS) and the projection of bioethanol production cost given <strong>in</strong> Table<br />
5. The difference, however, is almost negligible as the <strong>in</strong>corporation rate of bioethanol is only 10%,<br />
and fuel costs do not exceed 20–25% of total costs.