Potentiale zur energetischen Nutzung von Biomasse in der ... - EPFL
Potentiale zur energetischen Nutzung von Biomasse in der ... - EPFL
Potentiale zur energetischen Nutzung von Biomasse in der ... - EPFL
Erfolgreiche ePaper selbst erstellen
Machen Sie aus Ihren PDF Publikationen ein blätterbares Flipbook mit unserer einzigartigen Google optimierten e-Paper Software.
56<br />
costs (and consequently, the Total Project Investment) were consi<strong>der</strong>ed to decrease by 20% from<br />
2010 to 2025 and by another 20% by 2040. Conversion efficiency is expected to improve from 69%<br />
<strong>in</strong> 2010 to 90% <strong>in</strong> 2060, due to the development of commercial production of more specific enzymes<br />
and yeasts and the associated ga<strong>in</strong>s <strong>in</strong> ethanol yield and productivity. Operat<strong>in</strong>g costs were consi<strong>der</strong>ed<br />
to decrease regularly due to improv<strong>in</strong>g labour productivity as well as conversion efficiency. For a given<br />
annual ethanol production, the plant is <strong>in</strong>deed go<strong>in</strong>g to consume less and less feedstock, thereby<br />
reduc<strong>in</strong>g variable and fixed operat<strong>in</strong>g costs. As far as concerns the size of the plant, it was assumed<br />
that second and third generation ethanol plants would be 1.5 and 2 times larger than the reference<br />
plant, respectively. F<strong>in</strong>ally, the market price of by-products was consi<strong>der</strong>ed to rema<strong>in</strong> constant over<br />
the whole period of study.<br />
The scenarios of evolution of the key determ<strong>in</strong>ants presented <strong>in</strong> Table 4 describe the reference case<br />
consi<strong>der</strong>ed for bioethanol production from lignocellulosic feedstocks <strong>in</strong> Switzerland. However, given<br />
the uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty that surrounds most of the determ<strong>in</strong>ants, a sensitivity analysis was carried out <strong>in</strong> or<strong>der</strong><br />
to illustrate the variability with respect to the reference case. The same approach was adopted for the<br />
projected retail price of gasol<strong>in</strong>e. The hypotheses and results of the sensitivity analysis are presented<br />
and discussed <strong>in</strong> subsequent section. Interpretation of the f<strong>in</strong>al results should be done with caution.<br />
Presentation of the results<br />
Based on the cash flow analysis, the projected levelised production cost 15<br />
of bioethanol was then<br />
calculated for 2010, 2025 and 2040. The results are presented <strong>in</strong> Table 5. The evolution of the<br />
structure of the production cost is also given.<br />
Levelised production cost components 2010 2025 2040<br />
Feedstock cost [CHF/l] 0.67 0.59 0.56<br />
Investment cost [CHF/l] 0.61 0.42 0.27<br />
Variable operat<strong>in</strong>g cost [CHF/l] 0.05 0.05 0.05<br />
Fixed operat<strong>in</strong>g cost [CHF/l] 0.13 0.09 0.07<br />
Total [CHF/l] 1.46 1.15 0.95<br />
Total [cts/kWh ] th 24.7 19.4 16.1<br />
Table 5 Results of the projection of future bioethanol levelised production costs.<br />
As it can be read from Table 5, the production cost of bioethanol is expected to be reduced by 22%<br />
(from 1.46 CHF/l to 1.15 CHF/l) at the horizon 2025, and by 35% (from 1.46 CHF/l to 0.95 CHF/l) at<br />
the horizon 2040, with respect to the calculated production cost <strong>in</strong> 2010. One should be aware,<br />
however, that the present result strongly depend on the hypotheses about the evolution of the key<br />
determ<strong>in</strong>ants of bioethanol production costs, most of which are <strong>in</strong>deed surrounded by a significant<br />
uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty.<br />
The ma<strong>in</strong> characteristics of bioethanol plants envisaged at the horizon 2010, 2025 and 2040 are given<br />
<strong>in</strong> Table 6, together with the net energy balance of the process (<strong>in</strong> terms of feedstock <strong>in</strong>put, ethanol<br />
output and excess electricity output). Although the feedstock <strong>in</strong>put and ethanol production capacity<br />
are expressed <strong>in</strong> MW th , one should bear <strong>in</strong> m<strong>in</strong>d that energy-related units should be used with caution<br />
when compared to other technologies. Indeed, ethanol is meant to be used as a fuel and the<br />
comparison should really be done with other transportation fuels only, and us<strong>in</strong>g the most<br />
appropriate reference unit, <strong>in</strong> the present case a distance travelled.<br />
15 The levelised production cost corresponds to the sell<strong>in</strong>g price of ethanol which makes the NPV of the project zero.