Potentiale zur energetischen Nutzung von Biomasse in der ... - EPFL
Potentiale zur energetischen Nutzung von Biomasse in der ... - EPFL
Potentiale zur energetischen Nutzung von Biomasse in der ... - EPFL
Erfolgreiche ePaper selbst erstellen
Machen Sie aus Ihren PDF Publikationen ein blätterbares Flipbook mit unserer einzigartigen Google optimierten e-Paper Software.
52<br />
Consi<strong>der</strong><strong>in</strong>g the structure of bioethanol production as presented <strong>in</strong> Figure 9, a particular attention<br />
was put on the effect of “farm-gate price of biomass” and plant size. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to the remarks<br />
concern<strong>in</strong>g non-transport feedstock cost, the variation range consi<strong>der</strong>ed <strong>in</strong>cluded significantly lower<br />
values of that parameter, as biomass prices may already today be available at much lower prices and<br />
may also become cheaper <strong>in</strong> the near future with the potential competition with foreign feedstocks<br />
on the Swiss market. Optimal plant size <strong>in</strong> ethanol process designs has always been a much debated<br />
issue, and is strongly dependent on a f<strong>in</strong>e evaluation of transport feedstock costs. The question of<br />
whether it is more beneficial to build many small-scale units or one large-scale unit is largely<br />
dependent on local conditions, and this question of a centralized or decentralized production has<br />
def<strong>in</strong>itely not a unique nor a clear answer.<br />
The results of the sensitivity analysis presented above are first presented <strong>in</strong> separate <strong>in</strong>dividual graphs<br />
(Figure 10) to give an accurate picture of the effect of each parameter on the production cost of<br />
ethanol. In or<strong>der</strong> to compare the relative effects of the same parameters on the production cost of<br />
ethanol, the same results are then presented on a unique graph (Figure 11). The latter allows to assess<br />
which of the consi<strong>der</strong>ed parameters plays the most significant roles.<br />
Ethanol production cost [SFr/l]<br />
Ethanol production cost [SFr/l]<br />
Ethanol production cost [SFr/l]<br />
2.00<br />
1.90<br />
1.80<br />
1.70<br />
1.60<br />
1.50<br />
1.40<br />
1.30<br />
1.20<br />
1.10<br />
1.00<br />
2.20<br />
2.10<br />
2.00<br />
1.90<br />
1.80<br />
1.70<br />
1.60<br />
1.50<br />
1.40<br />
1.30<br />
1.20<br />
3.00<br />
2.50<br />
2.00<br />
1.50<br />
1.00<br />
0.50<br />
0.00<br />
Ethanol production cost vs. Price of biomass<br />
0 50 100 150 200 250<br />
Biomass price <strong>in</strong>dex [100 = 70.5 SFr/t]<br />
(a)<br />
Ethanol production cost vs. Interest rate<br />
0 50 100 150 200 250<br />
Interest rate <strong>in</strong>dex [100 = 10%]<br />
(c)<br />
Ethanol production cost vs. Plant size<br />
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350<br />
Plant size <strong>in</strong>dex [100 = 47.5 Ml/yr]<br />
(e)<br />
Ethanol production cost [SFr/l]<br />
Ethanol production cost [SFr/l]<br />
Ethanol production cost [SFr/l]<br />
2.30<br />
2.20<br />
2.10<br />
2.00<br />
1.90<br />
1.80<br />
1.70<br />
1.60<br />
1.50<br />
1.40<br />
1.30<br />
1.20<br />
1.10<br />
1.00<br />
1.52<br />
1.51<br />
1.50<br />
1.49<br />
1.48<br />
1.47<br />
2.20<br />
2.00<br />
1.80<br />
1.60<br />
1.40<br />
1.20<br />
1.00<br />
Ethanol production cost vs. Equipment cost<br />
0 50 100 150 200 250<br />
Equipment cost <strong>in</strong>dex [100 = 96.8 MSFr]<br />
(b)<br />
Ethanol production cost vs. Price of by-products<br />
0 50 100 150 200 250<br />
By-products price <strong>in</strong>dex [100 = 0.076 SFr/kWh]<br />
(d)<br />
Ethanol production cost vs. Conversion efficiency<br />
0.80<br />
50% 55% 60% 65% 70% 75% 80% 85% 90% 95% 100%<br />
Conversion efficiency<br />
Figure 10 Results of the sensitivity analysis on separate <strong>in</strong>dividual graphs for each parameter.<br />
(f)