Potentiale zur energetischen Nutzung von Biomasse in der ... - EPFL
Potentiale zur energetischen Nutzung von Biomasse in der ... - EPFL
Potentiale zur energetischen Nutzung von Biomasse in der ... - EPFL
Sie wollen auch ein ePaper? Erhöhen Sie die Reichweite Ihrer Titel.
YUMPU macht aus Druck-PDFs automatisch weboptimierte ePaper, die Google liebt.
Anhang 47<br />
Bundesamt für Energie BFE<br />
Figure 4 Mass and energy flow diagram.<br />
The Total Project Investment (based on equipment cost), as well as variable and fixed operat<strong>in</strong>g costs,<br />
were calculated. With these costs, a discounted cashflow analysis was performed to determ<strong>in</strong>e the<br />
production cost of ethanol when the Net Present Value (NPV) of the project is zero. The follow<strong>in</strong>g<br />
paragraphs describe each of these three cost areas and the assumptions to complete the cashflow<br />
analysis.<br />
Total project <strong>in</strong>vestment<br />
The total project <strong>in</strong>vestment as calculated <strong>in</strong> our model was based on the process design and the<br />
purchase cost of all equipment required. It was assumed <strong>in</strong> this study that the equipment cost would<br />
be the same <strong>in</strong> Switzerland as given by NREL for the US case. The equipment cost was therefore<br />
<strong>der</strong>ived by us<strong>in</strong>g US chemical eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g purchased equipment <strong>in</strong>dices to convert US$ (as quoted<br />
1997<br />
by NREL) to US$ and by apply<strong>in</strong>g the exchange rate (as of 01.01.2002) to get CHF (1.000 US$<br />
2002 2002<br />
1997 = 1.057 US$ 2002 = 1.736 CHF ) to the data from NREL (Figure 5).<br />
2002<br />
Installation factors as given by NREL were then applied to determ<strong>in</strong>e the <strong>in</strong>stalled cost of the<br />
equipment and consequently the total <strong>in</strong>stalled costs for each unit of the production plant. This study<br />
is more of a +25%/-10% accuracy, and more details will be necessary when the process is closer to<br />
an <strong>in</strong>dustrial realization.<br />
Once the Total Equipment Cost (TEC) has been determ<strong>in</strong>ed from the purchased costs and the<br />
<strong>in</strong>stallation factors, several other items must be added to obta<strong>in</strong> the Total Project Investment (TPI),<br />
namely warehous<strong>in</strong>g 6 , site development 7 , field expenses 8 , home office and construction fees 9 , project<br />
cont<strong>in</strong>gency 10 , and yet other costs 11 , amount<strong>in</strong>g to an additional 68.5% of the total equipment cost.<br />
6 Warehous<strong>in</strong>g was taken as 1.5% of the total equipment cost (TEC).<br />
7<br />
Site development was taken as 9% of the <strong>in</strong>stalled cost of process equipment (feed handl<strong>in</strong>g, pre-treatment, SSCF,<br />
cellulase production and ethanol recovery) and <strong>in</strong>cludes fenc<strong>in</strong>g, curb<strong>in</strong>g, park<strong>in</strong>g, roads, well dra<strong>in</strong>age, rail system, soil<br />
bor<strong>in</strong>gs and general pav<strong>in</strong>g. The factor which is used allows for m<strong>in</strong>imal site development assum<strong>in</strong>g a clear site, with non<br />
unusual problem such as right-of-way, difficult land clear<strong>in</strong>g or unusual environmental problem.<br />
8<br />
Field expenses were taken as 10% of the total <strong>in</strong>stalled cost (TIC) and <strong>in</strong>clude consumables, small tool equipment rental,<br />
field services, temporary construction facilities, construction supervision as well as prorateable costs such as fr<strong>in</strong>ge benefits,<br />
burdens and <strong>in</strong>surance of the construction contractor.<br />
9 Home office and construction fees were taken as 25% of the total <strong>in</strong>stalled cost (TIC) and <strong>in</strong>clude eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g plus<br />
<strong>in</strong>cidentals, purchas<strong>in</strong>g and construction.<br />
10 Project cont<strong>in</strong>gency was taken as only 3% of the total <strong>in</strong>stalled cost (TIC), because of the detail <strong>in</strong> the process design.<br />
11<br />
Other costs were taken as 10% of the total capital <strong>in</strong>vestment (TCI) and <strong>in</strong>clude startup and commission<strong>in</strong>g costs, land,<br />
permits, surveys and fees, pil<strong>in</strong>g, soil compaction and/or dewater<strong>in</strong>g, unusual foundations, freight, <strong>in</strong>surance <strong>in</strong> transit and