23.03.2013 Views

White Guide and Orange Guide Formatting Project - Pfizer

White Guide and Orange Guide Formatting Project - Pfizer

White Guide and Orange Guide Formatting Project - Pfizer

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Pfizer</strong>’s Corporate Integrity Agreements<br />

<strong>Orange</strong> <strong>Guide</strong> - Chapter 1: Overview <strong>and</strong> Key Principles<br />

A Corporate Integrity Agreement (CIA) is a written agreement with the OIG that typically imposes<br />

upon a company certain integrity obligations (e.g., training, reporting or audits) for a specified period of<br />

time, generally five years from the date the CIA is executed.<br />

<strong>Pfizer</strong> has entered into three CIAs as part of three settlements for alleged violations of federal<br />

healthcare program requirements.<br />

Lipitor CIA (2002): In 2002, <strong>Pfizer</strong> paid a $49 million fine <strong>and</strong> entered into a CIA for a term<br />

of five years. The case involved a qui tam (whistleblower) suit filed by a Warner-Lambert<br />

employee alleging that <strong>Pfizer</strong> provided $250,000 in undisclosed cash discounts (concealed<br />

as “unrestricted educational grants”) to a managed care customer to get Lipitor on the<br />

plan’s formulary. The government alleged that <strong>Pfizer</strong> underpaid Medicaid rebates as a result<br />

of failing to properly calculate the “best price” for Lipitor.<br />

Neurontin CIA (2004): In 2004, <strong>Pfizer</strong> paid a $429 million fine <strong>and</strong> entered into its second<br />

five-year CIA. The case was also based upon a whistleblower suit filed by a former Warner-<br />

Lambert employee alleging that <strong>Pfizer</strong> had engaged in off-label marketing to promote<br />

Neurontin.<br />

Bextra CIA (2009): In 2009, <strong>Pfizer</strong> entered into a five-year CIA as part of its settlement for<br />

alleged violations of federal health care program requirements. As part of the settlement,<br />

<strong>Pfizer</strong> paid $2.3 billion in fines. The case originated with eleven separate whistleblower<br />

lawsuits that included allegations that <strong>Pfizer</strong> promoted Bextra for uses <strong>and</strong> in dosages that<br />

the FDA did not approve. The CIA also settled alleged off-label promotional activities<br />

concerning several other <strong>Pfizer</strong> products.<br />

Under the 2009 CIA, <strong>Pfizer</strong> must annually report specific information to the OIG through December 31,<br />

2014. Some of the CIA requirements are new, while others reflect policies that <strong>Pfizer</strong> already had in<br />

place. Our obligations under the CIA include: (i) providing annual compliance training to most<br />

U.S. personnel; (ii) disclosing activities by colleagues that are non-compliant with healthcare laws;<br />

(iii) hiring an Independent Review Organization (IRO) to conduct annual reviews of certain <strong>Pfizer</strong><br />

systems, policies <strong>and</strong> processes; (iv) exp<strong>and</strong>ing certain transparency initiatives (such as posting<br />

payments to HCPs); <strong>and</strong> (v) monitoring certain Field Force <strong>and</strong> Headquarters activities.<br />

13<br />

Rev. 09/12<br />

Page 13 of 15

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!