27.07.2014 Views

thermal power development - Infraline

thermal power development - Infraline

thermal power development - Infraline

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Central electricity authority Annual Report 2009-10<br />

Year-wise Commercial Losses of<br />

Power Utilities<br />

Year<br />

Losses (Rs. Crores)<br />

2001-02 29331<br />

2002-03 21245<br />

2003-04 19107<br />

2004-05 23995<br />

2005-06 20869<br />

2006-07 27101<br />

2007-08 31862<br />

Source: PFC Reports on the performance of the State<br />

Power Utilities.<br />

9.1.3 Settlement of Dues<br />

The gap between average revenue<br />

realization and average cost of supply remained<br />

constantly high causing erosion over the years<br />

in the volume of internal resources generation<br />

by the SEBs and led many of them to virtual<br />

bankruptcy. The level of commercial losses of<br />

the SEBs/ utilities depended inter-alia on the<br />

unaccounted energy losses, effective subsidies<br />

incurred towards sales to agriculture and domestic<br />

sectors, efforts to neutralize them through cross<br />

subsidization and the level of subventions<br />

provided by the State Governments. Gross<br />

subsidy on energy sales had been increasing over<br />

the years because of the policy of some of the<br />

States to provide electricity at subsidized rates to<br />

agriculture and domestic consumers.<br />

Consequently, SEBs were unable to make<br />

full payments to Central Power Sector Utilities<br />

(CPSUs) for purchase of <strong>power</strong> and coal<br />

resulting in accumulation of huge outstanding<br />

amount to be paid by SEBs to CPSUs. This<br />

adversely affected the growth and performance<br />

of CPSUs. This payment deficit continues to rise<br />

and threaten the viability of the Central Power<br />

Utilities. Poor creditworthiness of SEBs also<br />

effectively blocked investments by the Private<br />

Sector despite the enabling and encouraging<br />

framework laid down by the Centre. Even<br />

in the post reform period, managerial and<br />

financial inefficiency in the State Sector utilities<br />

adversely affected capacity addition and system<br />

improvement programmes.<br />

In pursuance of the reforms process, the<br />

Expert Group constituted by the Government<br />

under the chairmanship of Member (Energy),<br />

Planning Commission recommended a scheme<br />

for one-time settlement of dues payable by the<br />

SEBs to CPSUs and Railways. This one-time<br />

settlement scheme (launched on 5 th March,<br />

2001) of dues owed by SEBs/Utilities to CPSUs,<br />

was aimed at making loss-making <strong>power</strong><br />

utilities bankable. In terms of the Scheme, 60%<br />

of interest/surcharge on the delayed payments/<br />

dues as on 30.9.2001 was waived and the rest of<br />

the dues were securitized through tax-free bonds<br />

issued by respective State Governments.<br />

Considerable progress has been made<br />

since in the settlement of dues payable by<br />

SEBs to CPSUs and the Railways. All State<br />

Governments signed the Tripartite Agreement<br />

envisaged under the scheme, which was<br />

between the State Government, Reserve Bank<br />

of India and the Government of India. Out of<br />

these, 27 States have issued bonds amounting<br />

to Rs.31,581 crores. Goa had no outstanding<br />

dues. The Government of the National Capital<br />

Territory of Delhi securitized its outstanding<br />

dues by converting their dues into long-term<br />

advances of Rs.3,376 crores payable to the<br />

CPSUs concerned separately under Bi-partite<br />

Agreements, as they do not have the <strong>power</strong> to<br />

issue bonds.<br />

9.1.4 Trend in Outstanding Dues to CPSUs<br />

by SEBs/Utilities<br />

CEA has been monitoring the status of the<br />

outstanding dues payable by SEBs to CPSUs.<br />

The total dues outstanding to various CPSUs for<br />

the period 2002-03 to 2009-10 are given in the<br />

table below:<br />

“Energy Saved is Energy Generated”<br />

97

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!