thermal power development - Infraline

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Central electricity authority Annual Report 2009-10 S. No. Name of the scheme Location (Distt./ Village) Capacity (MW) Present Status DPR submitted by M/s JPVL was for an installed capacity of 2,400 MW. After series of meetings/ discussions, value additions were made by CEA/ CWC, changes in layout were suggested due to which, it has been possible to accommodate one more generating unit of 300 MW thus increasing installed capacity of project from 2,400 MW to 2,700 MW and increasing design energy from 12,478 GWh to 13,237 GWh. Concurrence of CEA to Siang Lower HE project for installed capacity of 2,700 MW was accorded on 15.2.2010. 11.4.2 Subansiri Basin Projects – Arunachal Pradesh The originally identified project envisaged installed capacity of 4,800 MW. Subsequently, Govt. of Arunachal Pradesh accorded approval for development of three separate projects in place of earlier single project proposal in order to avoid submergence of Daporijo town and also to reduce displacement of people and to have minimal impact on the environment. The three separate schemes envisage total capacity of 5,600 MW and are as under: S. No. Name of Scheme 1. Subansiri Lower H.E. Project Gerukamukh village near original site on Subansiri River 2. Subansiri Middle H.E. Project Upstream of Tamen village on Kamla river which is tributary of Subansiri river 3. Subansiri Upper H.E. Project. Upstream of Daporijo near Mengal village on Subansiri River Location (District/ Village) Lower Subansiri / Gerukamukh Lower Subansiri/ Tamen Upper Subansiri/ Menga Capacity (MW) Present status 2,000 The project has been approved by CCEA on 09.09.2003 & is under construction by NHPC. The project is likely to be commissioned during 2012-14. 1,600 Project allotted to M/s Jindal Power Ltd. DPR likely by April, 2012. 2,000 The project is allotted to M/s KSK. 11.4.3 Tipaimukh Dam Project (6x250 = 1500 MW) – Manipur Tipaimukh H. E. Project is a multipurpose project involving hydro power generation, flood control and irrigation. The scheme envisages construction of a dam across river Barak immediately downstream of the confluence of the Tuivai River. The scheme envisages an installed capacity of 1,500 MW (6x250 MW). The project was entrusted to M/s NEEPCO for execution. However, lately MoP vide its letter dated 06.07.09 communicated that the implementation of the project would be done through a Joint Venture "Electricity is life: Conserve it." 119
Central electricity authority Annual Report 2009-10 among NHPC (69%), SJVNL (26%) and Govt. of Manipur (5%). Formation of Joint Venture is in progress. The project was techno-economically cleared by CEA vide its letter dated 2.7.2003 at an estimated cost of Rs.5163.86 crores at December 2002 price level including IDC of Rs.757.26 crores. Part estimate of Rs.9.52 crores for undertaking some works on priority under Stage-II activities of the project was recommended by CEA on 2.04.2004. Revised Cost Estimates of the project were cleared by CEA for an amount of Rs.6701.97 crores including IDC of Rs.816.40 crores at December 2004 price level on 6.05.2005. This estimate also included additional provision of Rs.1100.78 crores as Net Present Value (NPV) @ Rs.5.8 lakh per Hectare of submerged forest land converted for non-forestry use. First PIB meeting was held on 25.10.2005. As per the minutes of the meeting, MoP had to submit a Supplementary Note to be studied and considered in the Core Group of the PIB for finalizing its recommendations. Second PIB meeting was held on 31.01.2006 which recommended the project for placement before CCEA for consideration, subject to the following observations: i) Costs relating to flood moderation, diversion of National Highways and external security may be borne by the concerned administrative departments. The costs should be updated and availability of funds confirmed in the Note for CCEA. ii) Ministry of Power may take up the issue of high NPV cost with the MoE&F and reflect the outcome in the Note for CCEA. iii) Ministry of Power may persuade the State Governments of Mizoram and Manipur to reduce their share of free power from the project. iv) Project costs may be updated to December 2005 price level. v) Ministry of Power would obtain Environment and Forest Clearance before submitting the proposal for consideration of CCEA. vi) Risks relating to law and order and R&R to be explained clearly in the CCEA Note, along with strategies for risk mitigation. Views of Manipur and Mizoram Governments in this regard to be brought on record. vii) PPAs may be firmed up before the project is submitted for consideration of CCEA. viii) Adequacy of technical investigations, including critical design parameters, may be confirmed by the project authority to avoid any future surprises. As per PIB observations, following actions have been taken: i) The updated Revised Cost Estimates submitted by NEEPCO to CEA at November, 2005 price level were vetted by CEA on 22.03.2006 as Rs.5026.84 crores (as hard cost excluding IDC, flood moderation, diversion of National Highway and external security). Subsequently, CEA vetted the IDC component as Rs.828.99 crores (November, 2005 price level) in August, 2006. Thus, the total cost at November, 2005 price level works out to Rs.5855.83 crores. This cost did not include the cost of flood moderation, diversion of National Highway and external security. ii) In a meeting taken by Secretary (Power) on 26.2.2008 in MoP, NEEPCO indicated that MoWR on 15.12.2005 had conveyed approval for meeting cost of flood component. Ministry of Shipping, Road Transport and Highways conveyed their ‘In Principle Approval’ to meet cost of National Hightway diversion on 14.9.2006. MHA conveyed ‘In Principle Approval’ on 120 "CEA-Helping the Transformation of Indian Power Sector"
Page 2 and 3:
Central electricity authority Annua
Page 4 and 5:
Page 6 and 7:
Page 8 and 9:
Page 10 and 11:
Page 12 and 13:
Page 14 and 15:
Page 16 and 17:
Page 18 and 19:
Page 20 and 21:
Page 22 and 23:
Page 24 and 25:
Page 26 and 27:
Page 28 and 29:
Page 30 and 31:
Page 32 and 33:
Page 34 and 35:
Page 36 and 37:
Page 38 and 39:
Page 40 and 41:
Page 42 and 43:
Page 44 and 45:
Page 46 and 47:
Page 48 and 49:
Page 50 and 51:
Page 52 and 53:
Page 54 and 55:
Page 56 and 57:
Page 58 and 59:
Page 60 and 61:
Page 62 and 63:
Page 64 and 65:
Page 66 and 67:
Page 68 and 69:
Page 70 and 71:
Page 72 and 73:
Page 74 and 75:
Page 76 and 77:
Page 78 and 79: Central electricity authority Annua
Page 178 and 179:
Page 180 and 181:
Page 182 and 183:
Page 184 and 185:
Page 186 and 187:
Page 188 and 189:
Page 190 and 191:
Page 192 and 193:
Page 194 and 195:
Page 196 and 197:
Page 198 and 199:
Page 200 and 201:
Page 202 and 203:
Page 204 and 205:
Page 206 and 207:
Page 208 and 209:
Page 210 and 211:
Page 212 and 213:
Page 214 and 215:
Page 216 and 217:
Page 218 and 219:
Page 220 and 221:
Page 222 and 223:
Page 224 and 225:
Page 226 and 227:
Page 228 and 229:
Page 230 and 231:
Page 232 and 233:
Page 234:
show all

thermal power development - Infraline

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?