27.07.2014 Views

thermal power development - Infraline

thermal power development - Infraline

thermal power development - Infraline

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Central electricity authority Annual Report 2009-10<br />

The common reasons for delay in<br />

implementation of R&M-cum-LE schemes of<br />

BHEL supply units as experienced by some of<br />

the State utilities are:<br />

i) Delayed and non-sequential supply of<br />

materials from various BHEL units (Bhopal,<br />

Ranipet, Hyderabad).<br />

ii) Mismatching of spares supplied. A lot of<br />

rectification had to be done at site for BTG<br />

components.<br />

iii) Deployment of inadequate skilled<br />

man<strong>power</strong>.<br />

iv) Lack of co-ordination amongst BHEL’s<br />

various units.<br />

CEA has impressed upon BHEL to<br />

look into factors as brought out above, causing<br />

considerable extension of shut down period of<br />

<strong>thermal</strong> units where LE works are being carried<br />

out by BHEL as OEM.<br />

A strong message is required to percolate<br />

both at corporate level and unit levels of marketing<br />

and project management group of BHEL so that<br />

optimum utilization of existing generating assets<br />

already created in the Power Sector may be made<br />

through timely and successful implementation<br />

of R&M-cum- LE programme envisaged in the<br />

11 th Plan.<br />

6.12.5 Initiative taken by MoP / CEA for<br />

improvement in performance of<br />

<strong>thermal</strong> <strong>power</strong> stations during 11 th<br />

Plan<br />

The Partnership-in-Excellence (PIE)<br />

programme of 10 th Plan, launched by MoP in<br />

August 2005 continued in 11 th Plan till June<br />

2008 aiming at improving the performance of<br />

such stations which were running at PLF much<br />

below 60% by associating good operating units<br />

like NTPC, Tata Power etc. It was intended for<br />

adoption of better O&M practices in these stations<br />

so that the utilities could sustain better operating<br />

parameter on their own after completion of PIE<br />

programme.<br />

CEA identified <strong>thermal</strong> stations which<br />

were running at PLF below 60%. NTPC<br />

was chosen as partner in 16 <strong>thermal</strong> <strong>power</strong><br />

stations and Tata Power was selected in case<br />

of Dhuvaran TPS. Four stations decided to<br />

take self-improvement measures. CEA was<br />

actively associated in scheme identification,<br />

monitoring and facilitating implementation<br />

of PIE programme through interaction with<br />

utilities, equipment suppliers, agencies<br />

associated with PIE programme and visiting<br />

<strong>power</strong> plants regularly. The PIE programme<br />

has been concluded in all identified <strong>thermal</strong><br />

<strong>power</strong> stations by June 2008.<br />

There has been improvement in most of<br />

the stations with significant improvement in the<br />

following:<br />

Sl.<br />

No.<br />

Name of the plant / utility<br />

Capacity under PIE<br />

Programme (MW)<br />

PLF Before PIE<br />

Programme<br />

(Apr-Sep 2005)<br />

(%)<br />

PLF after PIE<br />

Programme<br />

(2007-08)<br />

(%)<br />

1 Bokaro ‘B / DVC 630 45.5 70.9 %<br />

2 Chandrapura / DVC 390 58.8 % 69.4 %<br />

3 Rajghat / IPGCL 135 42.5 % 75.5 %<br />

4 Ennore / TNEB 280 22.0 % 59.3 %<br />

5 Dhuvaran / GSECL 280 27.0 % 71.0 %<br />

6 Kutchlignite / GSECL 215 28.3 % 72.9 %<br />

"Electricity is life: Conserve it."<br />

77

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!