28.11.2014 Views

Online proceedings - EDA Publishing Association

Online proceedings - EDA Publishing Association

Online proceedings - EDA Publishing Association

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

teen wire segments of a coil, as in (3).<br />

∮<br />

⃗F = I<br />

d ⃗ l × ⃗ B = I( ⃗ L × ⃗ B) (3)<br />

The stator field was obtained from a 3D magnetostatic<br />

simulation from the software package COMSOL TM , as<br />

shown in figure 4. The simulation results were rastered and<br />

imported in Matlab. The mean value of the flux density in<br />

the range from minimum to maximum deflection yielded<br />

value of 0.9T in the z-direction. A driving current of 100mA<br />

would generate therefore a lateral force of 7.2mN.<br />

As depicted in the simplified actuation principle in figure<br />

3, every coil actuation element requires one current source<br />

and two voltage sources. For analogue sources, a floating<br />

potential in the coil has to be taken in to account, which depends<br />

on the driving current. From the sheet resistance of<br />

the TC0302 metallization (< 2m#/sq) and the conductor<br />

geometry of the coils and connections, the total track resistance<br />

is calculated to be 0.71#. Assuming a maximum<br />

current of 100mA, a maximum voltage shift of 71mV is obtained.<br />

As the electrode voltages are above 25V, this shift is<br />

assumed to be negligible. The power consumption is estimated<br />

at 7.1mW.<br />

C. Restoring forces<br />

The restoring forces are generated using single-beam<br />

flexures in the x-y plane because this method enables a feasible<br />

way to interconnect the coils and guarantees a defined<br />

zero-deflection position. Furthermore, the spring forces,<br />

partially compensate for the quadratic dependence of the<br />

pull forces of the electrostatic actuator with respect to the<br />

deflection.<br />

11-13 <br />

May 2011, Aix-en-Provence, France<br />

<br />

The mechanical properties of the co-fired LTCC were obtained<br />

from the manufacturers’ data sheets. For the HL2000<br />

ceramic, the flexural strength is specified above 200MPa.<br />

The Young’s modulus, derived from DuPont 941, is assumed<br />

to be 120GPa. Tests with laser-structured doublebeams<br />

(length 12mm, width 120!m / 80!m, height 120!m)<br />

have shown that the flexures break at a deflection between<br />

1.5mm and 2mm, which leads according to the strain/stress<br />

curve of a beam with rectangular cross section to a force between<br />

11mN and 15mN and stresses between 227MPa and<br />

312MPa. Hence, the data determined by the manufacturer<br />

using four-point measurements apply to the aspect ratio of<br />

flexures, and a static maximum actuator stroke of 10!m can<br />

be calculated to result in a stress of 15.5MPa for a vertical<br />

point load. Figure 5 illustrates a flexure of one of the test<br />

structures (80!m sample), which is the smallest LTCC<br />

structure that could be manufactured with the laser.<br />

As described in [5], the strain-stress curve of LTCC<br />

shows nonlinear and strain-speed dependent characteristics.<br />

Thus, in contrast to metals, only small deflections allow the<br />

definition of a spring constant. Hence, the design was configured<br />

to provide the longest possible beams while retaining<br />

the 120º point symmetry of the device. This caused implicitly<br />

a modification of the angle between the two beams<br />

from 90º to 80º, as the via interconnections are fixed. The<br />

spring constant for a single ended beam with the dimensions<br />

l " b " h can be approximated using unified beam theory<br />

[20]:<br />

, k y = E hb3<br />

4 l 3 (4)<br />

Where k z is vertical spring constant, k y the lateral spring<br />

constant and E the elastic modulus. For the inner beams<br />

Fig. 5: Laser cut LTCC beam flexure used for stress test.<br />

Fig. 6: Prototype magnet layers made of acrylic.<br />

113

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!