Online proceedings - EDA Publishing Association
Online proceedings - EDA Publishing Association
Online proceedings - EDA Publishing Association
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
!<br />
11-13 May 2011, Aix-en-Provence, France<br />
Characterisation and Comparison of Water and<br />
Alcohol as Catalysts in Vapour Phase HF Etching of<br />
Silicon Oxide Films<br />
D. Drysdale 1 , T. O’Hara 2 , C. H. Wang 1<br />
1<br />
School of Engineering & Physical Sciences, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, EH14 4AS, UK<br />
3<br />
memsstar Ltd, Scottish Microelectronics Centre, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH9 3JF, UK<br />
Abstract- The comparison of etch rates and selectivities for thin<br />
films of silicon dioxide and silicon nitride with respect to water<br />
and alcohol based (ethanol in this case) catalysts in a vapour phase<br />
HF etching process is discussed. Observation of etch rates for both<br />
PECVD Oxide and Nitride films are used to describe the<br />
behaviour of silicon dioxide etching. These behaviour<br />
characteristics can also be used to develop selectivity behaviours<br />
between the two films based on each of the catalysts. A number of<br />
factors are considered in the vapour phase etching process: the<br />
total gas flow for the etching process, process temperature and the<br />
etching pressure. The paper discusses the differences between<br />
both water and ethanol as process catalysts for the improvement<br />
of silicon dioxide etching selectivity with respect to silicon nitride.<br />
Results show that using water as a catalyst, a selectivity of up to<br />
40:1 can be achieved while with a direct comparison of the same<br />
etch process with ethanol, the highest achievable selectivity is 15:1.<br />
On the other hand, with comparable etch rates to that of the<br />
water catalyst process, the highest selectivity achieved was 10:1.<br />
I. INTRODUCTION<br />
The use of anhydrous HF vapour as an etchant has become<br />
commonplace within microelectromechanical systems<br />
(MEMS). It is typically used in the production of free-standing<br />
structures for a range of MEMS devices such as RF switches,<br />
accelerometers and microphones. From the initial etching<br />
technique using acid baths as described by Holmes and Snell<br />
[1] with further study by G. Van Barel et al. [2],[3] in<br />
understanding behaviour within wet processing to the recent<br />
work of vapour phase HF etching by Witvrouw et al. [4]. The<br />
use of HF for etching silicon dioxide has become a standard<br />
process technique and as its impact becomes more prominent<br />
with the growth of the MEMS industry in fabricating many<br />
devices. A critical process in MEMS production is the<br />
integration of the release process to the existing semiconductor<br />
fabrication processes.<br />
Many large-scale fabrication facilities still work solely with<br />
CMOS processes and materials thus developing new etching<br />
options that integrate well with these standardised methods<br />
reduces the difficulty of developing next generation MEMS<br />
devices. Many of today’s modern MEMS devices typically<br />
require one or more of five common CMOS materials:<br />
aluminium, silicon, polysilicon, silicon dioxide and silicon<br />
nitride. While HF etching is not a problem in terms of<br />
selectivity to the first three materials, problems arise in using<br />
an HF etch which is selective to silicon dioxide with respect to<br />
silicon nitride. The use of silicon dioxide as the sacrificial<br />
material of choice is for many reasons; typically used as<br />
passivation and insulating layers as well as dielectric layers for<br />
a device depending on the thickness of the film.<br />
The main focus of silicon dioxide in this study is its role as a<br />
sacrificial layer for the fabrication of MEMS devices such as<br />
microphones and RF MEMS switches. It is however, common<br />
to have silicon nitride layers and silicon dioxide layers stacked<br />
on top of each other with the nitride layer forming part of the<br />
structural or functional part of the device while the oxide acts<br />
as a sacrificial layer to be removed to realise the final freestanding<br />
structure.<br />
While a wet process can typically be used, this generates a<br />
widely experienced phenomenon called stiction [5],[6]. Stiction<br />
is the near permanent adhesion of two surfaces commonly due<br />
to electrostatic forces, hydrogen bonding and Van der Waals<br />
forces. Should the restoration force of a movable structure be<br />
less than the adhesion force being applied to it by an external<br />
source (such as a bead of moisture), it will adhere reducing<br />
yield of functional devices and causing high levels of device<br />
failures. Stiction commonly occurs due to moisture present in<br />
micron scale devices as scaling laws suggest that even a single<br />
droplet of moisture applies a strong enough force to hold a<br />
released structure. This is often seen as the other key reason in<br />
the push to vapour phase processing from wet processing<br />
commonly employed the world over. By etching in a vapour<br />
phase, moisture generation is reduced and stiction is therefore<br />
reduced which in turn creates a higher yield for devices. The<br />
equation for etching silicon dioxide is defined as:<br />
catalyst catalyst<br />
SiO2 + 4HF ! SiF4 + 2H2O (1)<br />
This equation requires a catalyst for the reaction to begin and<br />
is typically considered to be either water or alcohol. As can be<br />
seen by the reaction, water is generated as a by-product and<br />
while the presence of too much water or any moisture within<br />
the reaction chamber can damage product wafers, its presence<br />
is needed not only to initiate the reaction, but to maintain it. It<br />
is the ability not only to remove the excess water generated but<br />
to control the other process factors of the etch to keep a high<br />
and repeatable etch process that is the key to its success. By<br />
studying the behaviour of these two key materials, it is hoped<br />
that a better understanding of the etching behaviour can be<br />
achieved thus helping future designs for MEMS devices.<br />
<br />
35