28.11.2014 Views

Online proceedings - EDA Publishing Association

Online proceedings - EDA Publishing Association

Online proceedings - EDA Publishing Association

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

!<br />

11-13 May 2011, Aix-en-Provence, France<br />

Characterisation and Comparison of Water and<br />

Alcohol as Catalysts in Vapour Phase HF Etching of<br />

Silicon Oxide Films<br />

D. Drysdale 1 , T. O’Hara 2 , C. H. Wang 1<br />

1<br />

School of Engineering & Physical Sciences, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, EH14 4AS, UK<br />

3<br />

memsstar Ltd, Scottish Microelectronics Centre, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH9 3JF, UK<br />

Abstract- The comparison of etch rates and selectivities for thin<br />

films of silicon dioxide and silicon nitride with respect to water<br />

and alcohol based (ethanol in this case) catalysts in a vapour phase<br />

HF etching process is discussed. Observation of etch rates for both<br />

PECVD Oxide and Nitride films are used to describe the<br />

behaviour of silicon dioxide etching. These behaviour<br />

characteristics can also be used to develop selectivity behaviours<br />

between the two films based on each of the catalysts. A number of<br />

factors are considered in the vapour phase etching process: the<br />

total gas flow for the etching process, process temperature and the<br />

etching pressure. The paper discusses the differences between<br />

both water and ethanol as process catalysts for the improvement<br />

of silicon dioxide etching selectivity with respect to silicon nitride.<br />

Results show that using water as a catalyst, a selectivity of up to<br />

40:1 can be achieved while with a direct comparison of the same<br />

etch process with ethanol, the highest achievable selectivity is 15:1.<br />

On the other hand, with comparable etch rates to that of the<br />

water catalyst process, the highest selectivity achieved was 10:1.<br />

I. INTRODUCTION<br />

The use of anhydrous HF vapour as an etchant has become<br />

commonplace within microelectromechanical systems<br />

(MEMS). It is typically used in the production of free-standing<br />

structures for a range of MEMS devices such as RF switches,<br />

accelerometers and microphones. From the initial etching<br />

technique using acid baths as described by Holmes and Snell<br />

[1] with further study by G. Van Barel et al. [2],[3] in<br />

understanding behaviour within wet processing to the recent<br />

work of vapour phase HF etching by Witvrouw et al. [4]. The<br />

use of HF for etching silicon dioxide has become a standard<br />

process technique and as its impact becomes more prominent<br />

with the growth of the MEMS industry in fabricating many<br />

devices. A critical process in MEMS production is the<br />

integration of the release process to the existing semiconductor<br />

fabrication processes.<br />

Many large-scale fabrication facilities still work solely with<br />

CMOS processes and materials thus developing new etching<br />

options that integrate well with these standardised methods<br />

reduces the difficulty of developing next generation MEMS<br />

devices. Many of today’s modern MEMS devices typically<br />

require one or more of five common CMOS materials:<br />

aluminium, silicon, polysilicon, silicon dioxide and silicon<br />

nitride. While HF etching is not a problem in terms of<br />

selectivity to the first three materials, problems arise in using<br />

an HF etch which is selective to silicon dioxide with respect to<br />

silicon nitride. The use of silicon dioxide as the sacrificial<br />

material of choice is for many reasons; typically used as<br />

passivation and insulating layers as well as dielectric layers for<br />

a device depending on the thickness of the film.<br />

The main focus of silicon dioxide in this study is its role as a<br />

sacrificial layer for the fabrication of MEMS devices such as<br />

microphones and RF MEMS switches. It is however, common<br />

to have silicon nitride layers and silicon dioxide layers stacked<br />

on top of each other with the nitride layer forming part of the<br />

structural or functional part of the device while the oxide acts<br />

as a sacrificial layer to be removed to realise the final freestanding<br />

structure.<br />

While a wet process can typically be used, this generates a<br />

widely experienced phenomenon called stiction [5],[6]. Stiction<br />

is the near permanent adhesion of two surfaces commonly due<br />

to electrostatic forces, hydrogen bonding and Van der Waals<br />

forces. Should the restoration force of a movable structure be<br />

less than the adhesion force being applied to it by an external<br />

source (such as a bead of moisture), it will adhere reducing<br />

yield of functional devices and causing high levels of device<br />

failures. Stiction commonly occurs due to moisture present in<br />

micron scale devices as scaling laws suggest that even a single<br />

droplet of moisture applies a strong enough force to hold a<br />

released structure. This is often seen as the other key reason in<br />

the push to vapour phase processing from wet processing<br />

commonly employed the world over. By etching in a vapour<br />

phase, moisture generation is reduced and stiction is therefore<br />

reduced which in turn creates a higher yield for devices. The<br />

equation for etching silicon dioxide is defined as:<br />

catalyst catalyst<br />

SiO2 + 4HF ! SiF4 + 2H2O (1)<br />

This equation requires a catalyst for the reaction to begin and<br />

is typically considered to be either water or alcohol. As can be<br />

seen by the reaction, water is generated as a by-product and<br />

while the presence of too much water or any moisture within<br />

the reaction chamber can damage product wafers, its presence<br />

is needed not only to initiate the reaction, but to maintain it. It<br />

is the ability not only to remove the excess water generated but<br />

to control the other process factors of the etch to keep a high<br />

and repeatable etch process that is the key to its success. By<br />

studying the behaviour of these two key materials, it is hoped<br />

that a better understanding of the etching behaviour can be<br />

achieved thus helping future designs for MEMS devices.<br />

<br />

35

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!