28.11.2014 Views

Online proceedings - EDA Publishing Association

Online proceedings - EDA Publishing Association

Online proceedings - EDA Publishing Association

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Clamps<br />

rotation<br />

[21]<br />

Clamps<br />

translation<br />

[21]<br />

Compliant<br />

structures<br />

[15]<br />

Thermal<br />

expanded<br />

arms<br />

Electromagnetic<br />

actuation<br />

11-13 <br />

May 2011, Aix-en-Provence, France<br />

<br />

exploit the features of the gripper surface (shape, material,<br />

TABLE 2<br />

MOST COMMON KINEMATIC STRATEGIES<br />

coatings, etc.), while the last ones make use of external<br />

Open state<br />

Closed state<br />

actions (forces, pressures, vibrations, etc) [20]. A list of<br />

releasing strategies is reported in Table 4.<br />

TABLE 3<br />

MOST COMMON STANDARD TYPOLOGIES OF FINGERTIP SHAPES<br />

Flat Angular carved Cylindrical carved<br />

piezoresistive transducers or micro capacitive sensors;<br />

however these approaches are usually limited by the low<br />

biocompatibility of materials and the possibility to induce<br />

electrolysis of water with related bubbles formation.<br />

Due to the small effect of gravity force compared to the<br />

adhesion and capillary forces in microgripping of bio-cells,<br />

the releasing is generally problematic. Many releasing<br />

strategies were tested in the literature and they can be<br />

divided in passive and active strategies; the first ones<br />

Passive releasing<br />

Active releasing<br />

Releasing strategy<br />

Rough surfaces<br />

Hydrophobic coating<br />

Conductive coating<br />

Vacuum environment<br />

Fluid environment<br />

Ionized air<br />

Vibrations<br />

Air pressure<br />

Heating<br />

Electrostatic control<br />

Adhesion to the<br />

substrate<br />

Additional tools<br />

TABLE 4<br />

MOST COMMON PASSIVE AND ACTIVE RELEASING STRATEGIES<br />

III. DESIGN AND FEM OPTIMIZATION<br />

As mentioned before, different kind of problems in living<br />

cells manipulation are related to the health of cells and<br />

caused by the actuator part of microgrippers. Therefore, in<br />

all kind of actuators any undesirable effect of actuator on<br />

biological cells has to be avoided. In this paper a kind of<br />

gripper is considered that uses external actuator approach as<br />

its actuation method. In this approach the actuation part<br />

completely separates from gripping jaws. It seems that it is<br />

the first time that external actuation method is proposed for<br />

biological cells manipulation in order to solve all kind of<br />

problems that are related to the actuation mechanism of<br />

microgrippers. Furthermore, the fabrication process of the<br />

gripper can be considerably simplified by using this<br />

approach. This separation allows using different kind of<br />

actuators as driving part of the gripper without any<br />

consideration to their undesired effects on cells health.<br />

Several configurations were considered to define a shape<br />

suitable for this application. Figures 1 to 4 show the<br />

improvement procedure of microgripper design in this<br />

work. For all those layouts tip of the gripper was conceived<br />

to be proper for gripping of a cell with 35 µm diameter.<br />

Moreover, the total length of all proposed configurations<br />

and their out-of-plane thickness are 1 mm and 20 µm,<br />

respectively, and was considered fixed parameters during<br />

optimization procedure. Furthermore, the applied<br />

displacement to the moving arm of the gripper was<br />

considered 20 µm when it was pulled and 10 µm when it<br />

was pushed. In all FEM analysis of the structures we<br />

changed the geometrical parameters so that the maximum<br />

stress did not exceed of 34 MPa. Four dimensional models<br />

of the proposed layouts were developed and then<br />

investigated by the finite element code ANSYS.<br />

Description<br />

The contact area is reduced, as the electrostatic adhesion force.<br />

It reduces the surface tension effect.<br />

The electrostatic forces are reduced by conductive coatings or materials with small potential difference<br />

with the object.<br />

It reduced the surface tension effect.<br />

It eliminates the surface tension effect and reduces electrostatic forces.<br />

It reduces electrostatic forces.<br />

The acceleration imposed causes the object releasing due to inertial force.<br />

A pressurized air flow overcomes the adhesion forces.<br />

The temperature increasing reduces the capillary forces.<br />

The electrostatic force is controlled by shorting the gripper electrodes or inverting the polarity.<br />

The object adheres to the substrate due to higher adhesion forces, or gluing on the substrate, or engagement<br />

by the substrate.<br />

Additional tools are used to detach the object.<br />

358

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!