28.11.2014 Views

Online proceedings - EDA Publishing Association

Online proceedings - EDA Publishing Association

Online proceedings - EDA Publishing Association

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

11-13 <br />

May 2011, Aix-en-Provence, France<br />

<br />

Figure 2: Package roadmap of automotive acceleration sensors<br />

III. ACCELERATION SENSORS<br />

The success story of MEMS acceleration sensors started<br />

nearly 20 years ago with first high-g sensors for airbag<br />

applications and continued with low-g sensors for ABS,<br />

ESP, etc. Today over 90% of all new passenger cars are<br />

sold with an airbag system with at least one<br />

micromechanical acceleration sensor inside. These<br />

impressing equipment rates are only possible due to a<br />

continous and massive reduction of the costs of an airbag<br />

system and therefore also of the integrated acceleration<br />

sensor. This is achieved by strong improvements in the<br />

micromechanical sensing elements, the ASIC and – last but<br />

not least – the packaging. Fig. 2 shows the roadmap of<br />

packages for airbag acceleration sensors at Bosch. The first<br />

sensor, issued in the late 1970s, was a mechanical sensor<br />

element in a metal can. In the mid 1980s the first<br />

mechanical sensor followed with the ASIC integrated in the<br />

same metal package. It was supplanted in 1996 by the first<br />

generation of micromechanical acceleration sensors in a<br />

PLCC28 package. The current generation of airbag<br />

accelerometers, starting in 2010, uses a SOIC8 package.<br />

This corresponds to a size reduction of more than 85% in 14<br />

years.<br />

The massive size reduction was achieved by several steps<br />

in technology development. Due to design and process<br />

progress the micromechanical sensor element could be<br />

drastically reduced in size. The use of modern technologies<br />

in IC processes led to a steady decrease of the ASIC size at<br />

the same time – despite enhanced sensor performance and<br />

higher self-test capabilities. With sophisticated state of the<br />

art simulations – fed by the experience of several sensor<br />

generations and of far more than 1 billion sensors produced<br />

– key parameters of the package are optimized. The most<br />

important of those are<br />

• overall geometry (package height, length and width vs.<br />

die size, symmetry, …)<br />

• leadframe design (size, thickness, structure, …)<br />

• die-attach (material parameters like E-modulus,<br />

thickness,…)<br />

• mold compound (CTEs, …)<br />

• mold coverage (overall portion of mold compound vs.<br />

Silicon content of the package)<br />

The main hurdles for a more aggressive package size<br />

reduction are the the capability for further processing and<br />

the extreme environmental conditions automotive sensors<br />

have to withstand.<br />

Figure 3: Footprint of automotive and CE acceleration sensors<br />

Figure 4: Crosssection and SEM picture of BMA220 (© Chipworks)<br />

The consumer electronics (CE) industry has even higher<br />

constraints regarding package size (footprint as well as<br />

height). Bosch’s first acceleration sensor for CE in 2006<br />

reduced the automotive package size to a 4 4 mm² QFNpackage<br />

by half. Already one year later the size was further<br />

reduced to 3 3 mm². At the beginning of 2010 Bosch<br />

introduced the BMA220 - world’s first digital acceleration<br />

sensor in a 2 2 mm² LGA package. Fig. 3 shows the<br />

footprint development of automotive and CE sensors.<br />

One major step towards the 2 2 cm² package was the<br />

transition from side-by-side assembly to 3D stacked<br />

assembly. With this 3D Integration approach the ASIC is<br />

stacked on the micromechanical sensor element. Fig. 4<br />

depicts insights into the construction of the BMA220.<br />

IV. INERTIAL COMBI-SENSORS<br />

Sooner or later the further size reduction will become<br />

increasingly difficult. A new trend arises for sensors used in<br />

systems with a standard combinations of different sensors.<br />

An example are the inertial sensors used for vehicle<br />

dynamics control systems like ESP®. A typical ESP system<br />

needs the signals of a yaw rate sensor and an one or two<br />

axial low-g acceleration sensor.<br />

The first ESP systems were using a macro-mechanical<br />

yaw rate sensor, which was based on a piezoelectrically<br />

actuated, vibrating metal cylinder with piezo’s as sensing<br />

element of the Coriolis force [1], for detection of the car´s<br />

rotation along its vertical axis. In addition a mechanical<br />

single-axis low-g accelerometer has been applied to detect<br />

the vehicle´s dynamical state and for plausibilization of the<br />

yaw rate signal.<br />

2

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!