28.01.2015 Views

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Anomalous Stellar Energy Losses Bounded by Observations 83<br />

2.5.2 Helium Ignition<br />

Another powerful constraint arises from the agreement between the<br />

predicted and observationally inferred core m<strong>as</strong>s at the helium fl<strong>as</strong>h<br />

(Sect. 2.4.4). An energy-loss mechanism which is efficient in a degenerate<br />

medium (ρ ≈ 10 6 g cm −3 , T ≈ 10 8 K) can delay helium ignition.<br />

To establish the core-m<strong>as</strong>s incre<strong>as</strong>e <strong>as</strong> a function of nonstandard particle<br />

parameters one needs to evolve red giants numerically to the helium<br />

fl<strong>as</strong>h.<br />

However, <strong>for</strong> a simple analytic estimate one observes that the core<br />

m<strong>as</strong>s of a red giant grows by hydrogen shell burning. Because it is<br />

a degenerate configuration its radius shrinks and so the core rele<strong>as</strong>es<br />

a large amount of gravitational binding energy which amounts to an<br />

average energy source ⟨ϵ grav ⟩. If a novel energy-loss rate ⟨ϵ x ⟩ is of the<br />

same order then helium ignition will be delayed.<br />

In order to estimate ⟨ϵ grav ⟩ one may treat the red-giant core <strong>as</strong><br />

a low-m<strong>as</strong>s white dwarf. Its total energy, i.e. gravitational potential<br />

energy plus kinetic energy of the degenerate electrons, is found to be<br />

(Chandr<strong>as</strong>ekhar 1939)<br />

E = − 3 G N M 2<br />

7 R . (2.41)<br />

The radius of a low-m<strong>as</strong>s white dwarf (nonrelativistic electrons!) may<br />

be expressed <strong>as</strong> R = R ∗ (M ⊙ /M) 1/3 with R ∗ = 8800 km so that<br />

⟨ϵ grav ⟩ = − Ė<br />

M = G ( ) 1/3<br />

NM ⊙ M M ˙<br />

. (2.42)<br />

R ∗ M ⊙ M ⊙<br />

From the numerical sequences of Sweigart and Gross (1978) one finds<br />

that near the helium fl<strong>as</strong>h M ≈ 0.5 M ⊙ and M ˙ ≈ 0.8×10 −15 M ⊙ s −1<br />

so that ⟨ϵ grav ⟩ ≈ 100 erg g −1 s −1 . There<strong>for</strong>e, one must require ⟨ϵ x ⟩ ≪<br />

100 erg g −1 s −1 in order to prevent the helium fl<strong>as</strong>h from being delayed.<br />

In order to sharpen this criterion one may use results from Sweigart<br />

and Gross (1978) and Raffelt and Weiss (1992) who studied numerically<br />

the delay of the helium fl<strong>as</strong>h by varying the standard neutrino losses<br />

with a numerical factor F ν where F ν = 1 represents the standard c<strong>as</strong>e.<br />

The results are shown in Fig. 2.25. Note that <strong>for</strong> F ν < 1 the standard<br />

neutrino losses are decre<strong>as</strong>ed so that helium ignites earlier, causing<br />

δM c < 0. It is also interesting that <strong>for</strong> F ν = 0 helium naturally<br />

ignites at the center of the core while <strong>for</strong> F ν > 1 the ignition point<br />

moves further and further toward the edge (Fig. 2.26). This behavior is

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!