28.01.2015 Views

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

430 Chapter 11<br />

high-energy <strong>for</strong>ward component; they are not fit well by the <strong>as</strong>sumed<br />

dominant detection process ν e p → ne + which is supposed to yield an<br />

isotropic positron distribution with no directional correlation with energy.<br />

El<strong>as</strong>tic νe scattering, however, does not fit the data well either<br />

because it is too <strong>for</strong>ward peaked, and anyhow it is disfavored by a small<br />

cross section unless the flux of ν µ,τ or ν µ,τ w<strong>as</strong> extremely high.<br />

However, because no plausible and/or viable nonstandard cause <strong>for</strong><br />

the observed events h<strong>as</strong> been proposed one h<strong>as</strong> settled <strong>for</strong> the interpretation<br />

of a statistical fluctuation <strong>for</strong> the apparent anomalies. After all,<br />

it is difficult to imagine a small sample drawn from any distribution<br />

without some “anomalies” which are e<strong>as</strong>y to overinterpret. Still, if a<br />

re<strong>as</strong>onable alternative to the standard interpretation of the signal were<br />

to come <strong>for</strong>th this topic would have to be reconsidered.<br />

11.4 Neutrino Oscillations<br />

11.4.1 Overview<br />

The expected neutrino signature from a stellar collapse and conversely<br />

the inferred protoneutron star properties from the SN 1987A neutrino<br />

signal both depend on the <strong>as</strong>sumption that “nothing happens” to the<br />

neutrinos on their way to us. One simple modification of the expected<br />

signal is a dispersion of the ν e burst caused by a nonvanishing m νe in<br />

the 10 eV range (Sect. 11.3.4). Dispersion effects could also be caused<br />

by novel interactions with the galactic magnetic field, dark matter, the<br />

neutrino background, or simply by decays. All of these scenarios require<br />

relatively exotic particle-physics <strong>as</strong>sumptions which can be constrained<br />

by the SN 1987A signal (Chapter 13). The <strong>as</strong>sumption of small neutrino<br />

m<strong>as</strong>ses and mixings, however, fits into the standard model with<br />

minimal extensions, and may already be implied by the solar neutrino<br />

observations (Sect. 10.6). There<strong>for</strong>e, it is prudent not to ignore the<br />

possible impact of oscillations on SN neutrinos.<br />

The most obvious consequence is that the prompt ν e burst could oscillate<br />

into another flavor which then would be much harder to observe<br />

because of the reduced ν-e cross section <strong>for</strong> non-ν e flavors (Fig. 11.10).<br />

Notably, if the solar ν e flux is depleted by resonant oscillations one may<br />

expect the same in the SN mantle and envelope where a large range of<br />

densities and density gradients is available. It will turn out, however,<br />

that the small-angle MSW solution to the solar neutrino problem leaves<br />

an observable ν e burst (Sect. 11.4.2).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!