28.01.2015 Views

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

222 Chapter 6<br />

It depends on the physical circumstances which procedure is a better<br />

approximation. If one considers bremsstrahlung processes with degenerate<br />

electrons scattering off nondegenerate nuclei, the crossing time of<br />

an electron of a region the size kS<br />

−1 is short compared to the crossing<br />

time of nuclei. Hence, the latter can be viewed <strong>as</strong> static, the probe sees<br />

one configuration at a time, and one certainly should use the “square<br />

first” procedure instead of Eq. (6.61) to account <strong>for</strong> screening. This is<br />

achieved by the following consideration of correlation effects.<br />

6.4.2 Correlations and Static Structure Factor<br />

The screening of electric fields in a pl<strong>as</strong>ma is closely related to correlations<br />

of the positions and motions of the charged particles. If a negative<br />

test charge is known to be in a certain position, the probability of finding<br />

an electron in the immediate neighborhood is less than average,<br />

while the probability of finding a nucleus is larger than average. It is<br />

this polarization of the surrounding pl<strong>as</strong>ma which screens a charge.<br />

Take one particle of a given species to be the origin of a coordinate<br />

system, and take their average number density to be n. The electrostatic<br />

repulsion of the test charge causes a deviation of the surrounding<br />

charges from the average density by an amount<br />

S(r) = δ 3 (r) + n h(r), (6.62)<br />

where h(r) me<strong>as</strong>ures the particle correlations. They vanish in an ideal<br />

Boltzmann g<strong>as</strong>: h(r) = 0. The Fourier trans<strong>for</strong>m<br />

∫<br />

S(q) = d 3 r S(r) e −iq·r (6.63)<br />

is the static structure factor of the electron distribution. In the absence<br />

of correlations (h = 0) one h<strong>as</strong> trivially S(q) = 1.<br />

In order to make contact with Debye screening consider the Yukawa<br />

potential of Eq. (6.57) which represents a charge density<br />

ρ(r) = δ 3 (r) − k2 S<br />

4π<br />

e −k Sr<br />

r<br />

. (6.64)<br />

The volume integral of ρ(r) vanishes, giving zero total charge, i.e. complete<br />

screening at infinity. If one imagines that only one species of<br />

charged particles is mobile on a uni<strong>for</strong>m background of the opposite<br />

charge, then Eq. (6.64) implies correlations between the mobile species<br />

of n h(r) = −(kS/4πr) 2 e −kSr . As expected, Debye screening corresponds

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!