28.01.2015 Views

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Particle Dispersion and Decays in Media 239<br />

this process is kinematically <strong>for</strong>bidden. However, longitudinal electromagnetic<br />

excitations (pl<strong>as</strong>mons), which exist only in the medium,<br />

propagate such that <strong>for</strong> some momenta ω 2 − k 2 < 0 (space-like fourmomentum),<br />

allowing <strong>for</strong> Cherenkov emission. One finds statements<br />

in the literature that the neutrino energy transfer to the medium by<br />

this process exceeded the transfer by (incoherent) ν-e scattering (e.g.<br />

Oraevskiĭ and Semikoz 1984; Oraevskiĭ, Semikoz, and Smorodinskiĭ<br />

1986; Semikoz 1987a). This is in conflict with the discussion of Kirzhnits,<br />

Losyakov, and Chechin (1990) who found on general grounds that<br />

the energy loss of a neutrino propagating in a stable medium w<strong>as</strong> always<br />

bounded from above by the collisional energy loss, apart from a<br />

factor of order unity. Granting this, the Cherenkov process does not<br />

seem to be of great practical importance.<br />

If neutrinos have m<strong>as</strong>ses and mix, decays of the <strong>for</strong>m ν 2 → ν 1 γ are<br />

possible in vacuum, and can be kinematically possible in a medium if<br />

the photon “effective m<strong>as</strong>s” does not exceed the neutrino m<strong>as</strong>s difference<br />

m 2 − m 1 . If kinematically allowed, this decay receives a contribution<br />

from the medium-induced coupling which may far exceed the<br />

vacuum decay rate. Explicit calculations were per<strong>for</strong>med by a number<br />

of authors 36 who un<strong>for</strong>tunately ignored the kinematic constraint<br />

imposed by the photon dispersion relation. This is not a re<strong>as</strong>onable<br />

approximation in view of the relatively small neutrino m<strong>as</strong>ses that remain<br />

of practical interest. Further, in order to judge the importance<br />

of the medium-induced decay it is not relevant to compare with the<br />

vacuum decay rate, but rather one should compare with the collisional<br />

transition rate ν 2 e → eν 1 (mediated by photon exchange) which is the<br />

process with which the coherent reaction directly competes.<br />

The photon decay <strong>as</strong> well <strong>as</strong> the Cherenkov process and the mediuminduced<br />

neutrino decay all have in common that the neutrino couples<br />

to an electromagnetic field which is a freely propagating wave, obeying<br />

the dispersion relation in the medium which is ω 2 − k 2 = π T,L (ω, k)<br />

<strong>for</strong> transverse and longitudinal excitations, respectively. However, one<br />

may also consider the effect of a static external electric or magnetic<br />

field. 37 To this end, one must take the static limit ω → 0 of the<br />

vertex functions Λ αβ<br />

V,A(ω, k). For an external static electric field the<br />

only nonvanishing component of the vector potential A µ is A 0 . Then<br />

36 D’Olivo, Nieves, and Pal (1990); Kuo and Pantaleone (1990); Giunti, Kim, and<br />

Lam (1991).<br />

37 This issue h<strong>as</strong> been investigated in many works, e.g. Oraevskiĭ and Semikoz<br />

(1985, 1987), Semikoz (1987a,b), Nieves and Pal (1989c, 1994), Semikoz and<br />

Smorodinskiĭ (1988, 1989), and D’Olivo, Nieves, and Pal (1989).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!