28.01.2015 Views

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Anomalous Stellar Energy Losses Bounded by Observations 57<br />

ROSAT. X-rays have been observed from a number of compact sources<br />

in supernova remnants and from several isolated pulsars. However,<br />

with the limited spectral resolution of these instruments it is difficult<br />

to extract the actual thermal surface emission because there can be<br />

significant nonthermal x-ray emission from the magnetosphere.<br />

There are three candidates in the 10 3 yr age category (3C58, the<br />

Crab pulsar, RCW 103) from which x-rays have been observed by the<br />

Einstein Observatory (Tab. 2.4). However, ROSAT did not detect a<br />

compact source in RCW 103; only an upper flux limit h<strong>as</strong> been reported<br />

(Tab. 2.4). The Crab pulsar is x-ray bright mostly from nonthermal<br />

emission so that ROSAT could only establish an upper limit on<br />

its surface temperature. The remaining Einstein source 3C58 probably<br />

should also be interpreted <strong>as</strong> an upper limit on thermal surface emission.<br />

These upper limits are in agreement with the standard cooling<br />

curves of Nomoto and Tsuruta (1987) shown in Fig. 2.15.<br />

The Einstein data point <strong>for</strong> the Vela pulsar at an age of about<br />

10 4 yr is somewhat low, a fact which h<strong>as</strong> given rise to the speculation<br />

that “exotic” cooling effects may be operating such <strong>as</strong> neutrino emission<br />

by virtue of a meson condensate. However, a blackbody spectral fit to<br />

the ROSAT observations yields a much higher temperature (Tab. 2.4,<br />

Fig. 2.15. Surface temperature (observed at infinity) of a neutron star with<br />

baryon m<strong>as</strong>s 1.4 M ⊙ (gravitational m<strong>as</strong>s 1.3 M ⊙ ) according to Nomoto and<br />

Tsuruta (1987). The solid line is <strong>for</strong> an equation of state of intermediate<br />

stiffness (model FP), the dotted line <strong>for</strong> a stiff (PS), and the d<strong>as</strong>hed line <strong>for</strong><br />

a soft model (BPS). All “nonstandard” effects were ignored. The me<strong>as</strong>urements<br />

of Tab. 2.4 are also shown.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!