28.01.2015 Views

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Radiative Particle Decays 453<br />

corresponding particles and antiparticles are the same. However, the<br />

partial decay rates into specific channels need not be identical, and<br />

indeed, K ◦ and K ◦ show such CP-violating decays: A trans<strong>for</strong>mation<br />

under CP leads to a “mirror world” which is different from the one we<br />

live in. There<strong>for</strong>e, in the most general c<strong>as</strong>e one may only <strong>as</strong>sume that<br />

ν and ν have the same total lifetimes while their radiative decay rates<br />

may be different.<br />

However, it is common to analyze the available data under the <strong>as</strong>sumption<br />

of CP conservation <strong>for</strong> all neutrino interactions. For the<br />

radiative decay of a polarized ν in its rest frame, the CP-mirrored decay<br />

is one where a polarized ν with the same spin decays into ν ′ and<br />

γ of reversed momenta. 70 There<strong>for</strong>e, ν and ν of the same polarization<br />

are characterized by opposite values <strong>for</strong> α in Eq. (12.2). In the source,<br />

however, the ν’s and ν’s are produced by weak interactions which violate<br />

parity maximally. If they are relativistic they both have negative<br />

(left-handed) chiralities which means that the ν’s have negative and the<br />

ν’s positive helicities. Thus, relative to their momentum left-handed<br />

ν’s and ν’s show the same distribution of decay photons so that in<br />

Eq. (12.5) one must use the same α <strong>for</strong> both.<br />

12.2.2 Electron Neutrinos from Reactors<br />

Fission reactors are superb neutrino sources. At a thermal power of<br />

2800 MW, <strong>for</strong> example, one expects about 5×10 20 ν e /s. At a distance<br />

of 30 m this corresponds to a flux of about 4×10 12 cm −2 s −1 , almost a<br />

hundred times larger than the solar ν e flux of about 6.6×10 10 cm −2 s −1 .<br />

Reactor ν e ’s emerge from many weak decays of the products of the<br />

neutron induced fission of 235 U and 239 Pu while the fission of 238 U and<br />

241 Pu contributes less than 10% to the total rate. The spectral distribution<br />

can be inferred from a me<strong>as</strong>urement of the corresponding β spectra<br />

together with the re<strong>as</strong>onably well-known distribution of the end point<br />

energies of the fission products (von Feilitzsch et al. 1982; Schreckenbach<br />

et al. 1985). The distribution of ν e energies per fission of 235 U and<br />

239 Pu is shown in Fig. 12.2 with a total of about 6 ν e ’s per fission.<br />

An early, relatively crude, but often-quoted (Particle Data <strong>Group</strong><br />

1994) limit on the decay ν e → ν ′ γ w<strong>as</strong> derived by Reines, Sobel, and<br />

Gurr (1974) on the b<strong>as</strong>is of the upper limit γ flux in a scintillation detector<br />

near the Savannah River reactor (U.S.A.). A weaker but more reli-<br />

70 A parity trans<strong>for</strong>mation P inverts all polar vectors, e.g. momenta, currents,<br />

or electric fields, while it leaves axial vectors unchanged, e.g. angular momenta,<br />

magnetic moments, or magnetic fields.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!