28.01.2015 Views

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

76 Chapter 2<br />

may be substantial and thus would shorten the helium-burning lifetime<br />

<strong>as</strong> the nuclear fuel would be consumed f<strong>as</strong>ter.<br />

The HB/RGB number ratio R indicates that the acceleration of the<br />

HB evolution must not be too extreme. From Eq. (2.24) together with<br />

the observational result Eq. (2.27) one finds<br />

δ log R = 0.01 ± 0.06, (2.37)<br />

if one adopts Y env = 0.24 ± 0.02, ∆ RR = 0.1 ± 0.1, and δM c =<br />

±0.010 M ⊙ . There<strong>for</strong>e, R cannot be smaller by much more than about<br />

10% of its standard value. Put another way, the helium-burning lifetime<br />

of low-m<strong>as</strong>s stars is determined within about 10% from the ratio<br />

of HB/RGB stars in globular clusters.<br />

With lesser statistical significance this result is corroborated by<br />

number counts of clump giants in open clusters which consist of more<br />

recently <strong>for</strong>med stars in the galactic disk (Population I). Clump giants<br />

in open clusters correspond to HB stars in globular clusters; instead<br />

of <strong>for</strong>ming a horizontal branch they are concentrated in a clump near<br />

the b<strong>as</strong>e of the RGB. Cannon (1970) compared the number of clump<br />

giants in the open cluster M67 with the number of stars per luminosity<br />

interval near the MS turnoff and found t He ≈ 1.5×10 8 yr, with a<br />

large statistical uncertainty, however, because there were only 5 clump<br />

giants. (Open clusters tend to be much less populous than globular<br />

ones.) Tinsley and Gunn (1976) derived t He = (1.27 ± 0.29) × 10 8 yr<br />

from low-m<strong>as</strong>s giants of the old galactic disk population. These results<br />

are in full agreement with Eq. (2.23).<br />

2.4.5 An Alternate Analysis<br />

The above discussion of the globular-cluster limits is a somewhat updated<br />

version of my own previous work (Raffelt 1990b). Very recently,<br />

Catelan, de Freit<strong>as</strong> Pacheco, and Horvath (1995) have provided an independent<br />

new and extended analysis. While they closely follow the<br />

line of re<strong>as</strong>oning of Raffelt (1990b) they have changed numerous details.<br />

Of the 26 globular clusters which enter the ∆M tip<br />

HB argument,<br />

and of the 15 clusters which enter the R-method, they have discarded<br />

several with an extreme HB morphology. For the absolute brightness<br />

of RR Lyrae stars they have employed Walker’s (1992) values which<br />

depend on a precise knowledge of the LMC distance. For the brightness<br />

difference between zero-age HB stars and RR Lyrae stars they use<br />

∆ RR = 0.31 + 0.10 [Fe/H] = 0.18 + 0.10 Z 13 .

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!