28.01.2015 Views

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

374 Chapter 10<br />

The solar neutrino me<strong>as</strong>urements of the chlorine experiment seem<br />

to anticorrelate with solar activity <strong>as</strong> first suggested by Subramanian<br />

(1979) and Bazilevskaya, Stozhkov, and Charakhch’yan (1982). These<br />

latter authors also noted a correlation with the primary cosmic proton<br />

flux which, however, is known to correlate with the solar magnetic<br />

cycle because the solar magnetic field affects the flux of charged cosmic<br />

rays hitting the Earth. The cosmic-ray flux is not expected to affect<br />

the chlorine experiment directly; the average cosmic-ray induced 37 Ar<br />

production rate is about 0.055 day −1 , compared with an average solar<br />

neutrino signal of 0.48 day −1 . Figure 10.16 shows the temporal variation<br />

from 1970−1989 of the Homestake argon production rate, the integral<br />

number of sunspots, and the neutron counts at the McMurdo station in<br />

Antarctica. The latter are indicative of the primary cosmic-ray proton<br />

flux with energies above 0.4 GeV.<br />

While a certain degree of anticorrelation between the number of<br />

sunspots and the argon production rate is plainly visible in Fig. 10.16,<br />

there are two important questions: How significant is the effect If it<br />

is significant, what are its physical origins<br />

As <strong>for</strong> the latter question, the only plausible explanation 55 that h<strong>as</strong><br />

been put <strong>for</strong>th over the years is the hypothesis that neutrinos possess a<br />

small magnetic moment which allows them to spin-precess into sterile<br />

right-handed states in the presence of magnetic fields (Voloshin and<br />

Vysotskiĭ 1986; Voloshin, Vysotskiĭ, and Okun 1986a,b), and variations<br />

of this scheme which allow <strong>for</strong> simultaneous spin and flavor oscillations<br />

(Sect. 10.7). In this c<strong>as</strong>e one would expect some degree of a semiannual<br />

variation <strong>as</strong> explained above, but none is found in the Homestake data.<br />

The issue of statistical significance w<strong>as</strong> addressed on the b<strong>as</strong>is of the<br />

1970−1989 data by Filippone and Vogel (1990), Bieber et al. (1990),<br />

and Bahcall and Press (1991). These latter authors argued <strong>for</strong> rankordering<br />

<strong>as</strong> a statistical method because of the likely nonlinear relationship<br />

(if any) with indicators of solar activity, and because of the possibly<br />

non-Gaussian nature of the experimental errors. They produced pairs<br />

of an observed argon production rate and the corresponding sunspot<br />

index. Next, the Homestake data and sunspot indices were replaced by<br />

the ordinal rank in their respective data sets, i.e. the smallest value h<strong>as</strong><br />

rank 1, the second-largest rank 2, and so <strong>for</strong>th. In order to discover<br />

correlations they applied two standard rank statistical tests, the Spear-<br />

55 The refractive term in the MSW conversion probability from convective currents<br />

could play a role and could be coupled to solar activity (Haxton and Zhang 1991).<br />

However, extreme conditions are required to explain the observed effect.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!