28.01.2015 Views

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Miscellaneous Exotica 567<br />

For a narrow range of charges, these limits can be extended to larger<br />

m<strong>as</strong>ses by the SN 1987A cooling argument (Sect. 13.8.4). Accordingly,<br />

10 −9 e ∼ < e x ∼ < 10 −7 e (15.12)<br />

is excluded <strong>for</strong> m x up to several MeV, perhaps up to 10 MeV. On<br />

the trapping side of this range (large e x ) these particles surely would<br />

have an important impact on SN physics even though they cannot be<br />

excluded on the b<strong>as</strong>is of the simple cooling argument.<br />

If millicharged particles reach thermal equilibrium in the early universe<br />

be<strong>for</strong>e nucleosynthesis they contribute to the energy density and<br />

thus to the expansion rate. If they are one of the sequential neutrinos,<br />

this means that the right-handed degrees of freedom of that species<br />

are excited (they must be Dirac particles!), adding an effective neutrino<br />

degree of freedom. If they are nonneutrinos, even more energy<br />

is contributed, depending on their spin degrees of freedom. Even one<br />

additional effective neutrino degree of freedom is excluded and so <strong>for</strong><br />

any millicharged particle Davidson, Campbell, and Bailey (1991) found<br />

e x ∼ < 3×10 −9 e (15.13)<br />

if m < x ∼ 1 MeV. In certain models where the millicharged particles are<br />

<strong>as</strong>sociated with a shadow sector, more stringent limits apply (Davidson<br />

and Peskin 1994).<br />

Additional regions in the m<strong>as</strong>s-charge plane can be excluded by<br />

the requirement that the novel objects do not overclose the universe.<br />

However, these arguments depend on the annihilation cross section in<br />

the early universe so that one needs to know all of their interactions<br />

apart from the millicharge. It is hard to imagine novel particles which<br />

interact only by their small electric charge! For certain specific c<strong>as</strong>es<br />

the excluded regime w<strong>as</strong> derived by Davidson, Campbell, and Bailey<br />

(1991) and Davidson and Peskin (1994).<br />

All of these constraints leave the possibility open that ν τ ’s have a<br />

m<strong>as</strong>s in the 1−24 MeV range and a charge in the 10 −5 −10 −3 e range.<br />

Then they would annihilate sufficiently f<strong>as</strong>t be<strong>for</strong>e nucleosynthesis to<br />

actually reduce their effective contribution to the expansion rate (Foot<br />

and Lew 1993). In the standard model with small neutrino charges,<br />

however, two sequential neutrino species must carry a millicharge of<br />

equal but opposite magnitude (Babu and Volk<strong>as</strong> 1992; Tak<strong>as</strong>ugi and<br />

Tanaka 1992). Because the large charges required <strong>for</strong> Foot and Lew’s<br />

scenario are excluded <strong>for</strong> ν e and ν µ one would need to require that only<br />

ν τ carries a relatively large charge, <strong>for</strong>cing one to espouse even more<br />

exotic particle-physics models.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!