28.01.2015 Views

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

88 Chapter 2<br />

nonstandard energy-loss mechanism in stars are the white-dwarf luminosity<br />

function, the helium-burning lifetime of horizontal-branch stars,<br />

and the nondelay of helium ignition in low-m<strong>as</strong>s red giants <strong>as</strong> observed<br />

by the brightness of the tip of the red-giant branch in globular clusters.<br />

It w<strong>as</strong> possible to condense the latter two arguments into two<br />

exceedingly simple criteria, namely that an anomalous energy-loss rate<br />

in the cores of HB stars <strong>as</strong> well <strong>as</strong> in red-giant cores be<strong>for</strong>e helium<br />

ignition must not exceed about 10 erg g −1 s −1 . The emission rate is to<br />

be calculated at the pertinent pl<strong>as</strong>ma conditions, i.e. at an approximate<br />

temperature of 10 8 K = 8.6 keV, an electron concentration of<br />

Y e = 0.5, and an average density of about 0.6×10 4 g cm −3 (HB stars)<br />

or 2×10 5 g cm −3 (red giants). The <strong>for</strong>mer c<strong>as</strong>e corresponds to roughly<br />

nondegenerate conditions, the latter c<strong>as</strong>e to degenerate ones so that it<br />

depends on the density dependence of the emission rates which of these<br />

c<strong>as</strong>es will yield a more restrictive limit.<br />

A red-giant core is essentially a 0.5 M ⊙ helium white dwarf. The<br />

observed “real” white dwarfs have typical m<strong>as</strong>ses of about 0.6 M ⊙ ;<br />

they are thought to consist mostly of carbon and oxygen. Both the<br />

helium-ignition argument and the white-dwarf luminosity function allow<br />

one to constrain a novel energy-loss mechanism roughly on the level<br />

of standard neutrino emission. There<strong>for</strong>e, it is no surprise that bounds<br />

derived from both arguments tend to be very similar.<br />

There may be other objects or phenomena in the universe that me<strong>as</strong>ure<br />

novel particle-physics hypotheses even more sensitively than the<br />

c<strong>as</strong>es discussed here. They still need to make their way into the particle<br />

<strong>as</strong>trophysics literature.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!