28.01.2015 Views

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

324 Chapter 9<br />

Equation (9.22) and the corresponding result <strong>for</strong> ρ p were derived<br />

by Sigl and Raffelt (1993) whose exposition I have closely followed. In<br />

the nondegenerate limit where (1 − ρ p ) → 1 it agrees with a kinetic<br />

equation of Dolgov (1981) and Barbieri and Dolgov (1991). Moreover,<br />

a similar equation w<strong>as</strong> derived by Rudzsky (1990) which can be shown<br />

to be equivalent to Eq. (9.22) in the appropriate limits.<br />

The relatively complicated collision term that follows from the neutrino-neutrino<br />

Hamiltonian Eq. (9.16) h<strong>as</strong> been worked out by Sigl and<br />

Raffelt (1993). However, in a SN core the collisions of neutrinos with<br />

each other are negligible relative to interactions with nucleons and electrons.<br />

In the limit of a single neutrino flavor, or several unmixed flavors,<br />

the role of ρ p is played by the usual occupation numbers f p while the<br />

matrix G is unity, or the unit matrix. Then Eq. (9.22) is<br />

∫<br />

f˙<br />

p,coll =<br />

dp ′ [ W P ′ ,P f p ′(1 − f p ) − W P,P ′ f p (1 − f p ′)<br />

+ W −P ′ ,P (1 − f p )(1 − f p ′) − W P,−P ′ f p f p ′]<br />

(9.27)<br />

which is the usual Boltzmann collision integral. The main difference<br />

to Eq. (9.22) is the appearance there of “nonabelian Pauli blocking<br />

factors” which involve noncommuting matrices of neutrino occupation<br />

numbers and coupling constants.<br />

9.3.4 Recovering Stodolsky’s Formula<br />

The damping of neutrino oscillations becomes particularly obvious in<br />

the limit where a typical energy transfer ∆ 0 in a neutrino-medium interaction<br />

is small relative to the neutrino energies themselves. This<br />

would be the c<strong>as</strong>e <strong>for</strong> “heavy” and thus nonrelativistic background<br />

fermions. Then pair processes may be ignored and neutrinos change<br />

their direction of motion in a collision, but not the magnitude of their<br />

momentum, which also implies W (P, P ′ ) ≈ W (P ′ , P ). If the neutrino<br />

ensemble is isotropic one then h<strong>as</strong> ρ p = ρ p ′ under the integral<br />

in Eq. (9.22). For the matrix structure of the collision term this leaves<br />

2Gρ p G − GGρ p − ρ p GG = −[G, [G, ρ p ]] which puts the nature of the<br />

collision term <strong>as</strong> a double commutator in evidence—see also Eq. (9.13).<br />

One may define a total scattering rate <strong>for</strong> nondegenerate neutrinos of<br />

momentum p by virtue of<br />

∫<br />

Γ p = dp ′ W (P ′ , P ) . (9.28)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!