28.01.2015 Views

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Supernova Neutrinos 447<br />

An even more ambitious goal would be to me<strong>as</strong>ure the cosmic ν e<br />

background flux from all p<strong>as</strong>t SNe in the universe. For energies below<br />

around 10 MeV this flux is swamped by many orders of magnitude by<br />

that from the nuclear power plants on Earth. Above a few 10 MeV the<br />

atmospheric neutrino flux would dominate and so there is only a small<br />

window where the cosmic SN flux might be detectable. However, even a<br />

moderately sized (200 tons) scintillation detector located on the moon<br />

would have a chance of me<strong>as</strong>uring this flux because these backgrounds<br />

do not exist there (Mann and Zhang 1990).<br />

Returning to Earth one may speculate about what could be learned<br />

if a galactic SN were indeed observed at Superkamiokande. For the purpose<br />

of argument a distance of 10 kpc (5 times closer than the LMC)<br />

is <strong>as</strong>sumed. (Recall that the solar system is at a distance of about<br />

8 kpc from the galactic center.) Then one expects at Superkamiokande<br />

about 4000 events from the reaction ν e p → ne + , compared with 270<br />

at Kamiokande, and with 12 me<strong>as</strong>ured there from SN 1987A (Totsuka<br />

1990). This would be enough to determine a statistically very significant<br />

and very detailed “neutrino lightcurve.”<br />

Interestingly, one expects about 13 events within the first few ms<br />

from the prompt ν e burst. Its presence would indicate that the ν e ’s<br />

have not oscillated, say, into ν τ ’s <strong>as</strong> would be expected <strong>for</strong> a cosmologically<br />

interesting ν τ m<strong>as</strong>s (Sect. 11.4.2), thus excluding a large range<br />

of m<strong>as</strong>ses and mixing angles (Fig. 11.17). Moreover, the prompt burst<br />

could not have been dispersed by a neutrino m<strong>as</strong>s and so a m νe bound of<br />

order 1 eV could be derived. A number of other conclusions tentatively<br />

reached <strong>for</strong> SN 1987A could be affirmed (Sect. 13.2). The nonobservation<br />

of the prompt burst, on the other hand, would be more difficult<br />

to interpret <strong>as</strong> its absence could have a variety of causes ranging from<br />

neutrino oscillations to some flaw in the standard picture of SN collapse.<br />

The ν e lightcurve which would l<strong>as</strong>t, say, 10 s would not allow one to<br />

extract interesting bounds on m νe relative to the ones already obtained<br />

from SN 1987A and from laboratory experiments. From Eq. (11.9) one<br />

concludes that <strong>for</strong> a distance D ≈ 10 kpc one is sensitive to m<strong>as</strong>ses in<br />

the 100 eV range.<br />

In Superkamiokande one would expect to see about 40 events <strong>for</strong><br />

each ν µ +ν µ and ν τ +ν τ from the el<strong>as</strong>tic ν-e scattering process. Because<br />

the final-state electrons are strongly <strong>for</strong>ward peaked one can separate<br />

them from the isotropic ν e p → ne + signal. There<strong>for</strong>e, a ν µ or ν τ m<strong>as</strong>s<br />

would manifest itself through late <strong>for</strong>ward events. Seckel, Steigman,<br />

and Walker (1991) found that from the signal in water Cherenkov detectors<br />

one could be sensitive to a m<strong>as</strong>s down to about 75 eV. Of

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!