28.01.2015 Views

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

352 Chapter 10<br />

of details that have to be minded it is sometimes difficult to compare<br />

exactly the solar models of different workers. However, wherever a<br />

detailed comparison h<strong>as</strong> been per<strong>for</strong>med, different results <strong>for</strong> such output<br />

quantities <strong>as</strong> predicted neutrino fluxes usually can be understood<br />

in terms of different choices regarding some of the input physics (e.g.<br />

Bahcall and Pinsonneault 1992; Turck-Chièze and Lopes 1993). Thus,<br />

there is very little ambiguity in solar modelling <strong>for</strong> a common choice of<br />

input physics.<br />

Nonstandard solar models are ones where standard input parameters<br />

have been chosen outside the range of recognized uncertainties (<strong>for</strong><br />

example the opacities), or which include entirely new physical effects<br />

such <strong>as</strong> strong magnetic fields, f<strong>as</strong>t rotation in the deep interior, nonstandard<br />

nuclear reaction rates (involving free quarks, <strong>for</strong> example),<br />

energy transfer by a nonstandard mechanism (e.g. by trapped m<strong>as</strong>sive<br />

weakly interacting particles), and others. Some such possibilities can<br />

be excluded by the helioseismologically determined sound-speed profile<br />

of the Sun. I will not discuss nonstandard solar models any further—<br />

<strong>for</strong> an overview see Bahcall (1989). Naturally, it is always possible that<br />

a new “nonstandard” effect is recognized which could be important <strong>for</strong><br />

the solar structure and neutrino fluxes.<br />

One standard physical effect that h<strong>as</strong> made its way into standard<br />

solar models only recently is the gravitational settling of helium and<br />

metals. This effect leads to a stronger concentration of helium in the<br />

central region than is caused by nuclear burning alone so that the<br />

present-day Sun is “more evolved.” Consequently, the central temperature<br />

is slightly higher, leading to an incre<strong>as</strong>ed flux of boron neutrinos.<br />

The settling of metals leads to an incre<strong>as</strong>ed opacity, causing<br />

a further incre<strong>as</strong>e of the temperature and of the neutrino fluxes by<br />

a similar amount. Solar models with gravitational settling of helium<br />

significantly improve the already good agreement with the helioseismologically<br />

inferred sound-speed profile (Christensen-Dalsgaard, Proffitt,<br />

and Thompson 1993) while the settling of metals does not seem to have<br />

a strong additional impact on the p-mode frequencies (Proffitt 1994).<br />

Bahcall and Pinsonneault (1992) were the first to include helium settling<br />

in a standard solar model; in their 1995 paper they included metal<br />

settling <strong>as</strong> well. They find that the compound effect is to change the 8 B<br />

flux by +36%, the 7 Be flux by +14%, and the pp flux by −1.7%. Similar<br />

changes (+31%, +13%, and −1.7%) were found by Proffitt (1994)<br />

while Kovetz and Shaviv (1994), who included only helium settling,<br />

obtained smaller effects relative to the corresponding c<strong>as</strong>e of Bahcall<br />

and Pinsonneault (1992).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!