28.01.2015 Views

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

326 Chapter 9<br />

of ν e ’s because initially they have a large chemical potential and thus<br />

are far away from chemical equilibrium with the other flavors. Their<br />

high degree of degeneracy implies that ν e ’s may be ignored and with<br />

them all pair processes. There<strong>for</strong>e, the evolution of ν e ’s mixed with one<br />

other flavor (standard or sterile) is given by<br />

∫<br />

˙ρ p = i[ρ p , Ω p ] + 1 dp [ ′ W<br />

2<br />

P ′ P Gρ p ′G(1 − ρ p )<br />

−W P P ′ ρ p G(1 − ρ p ′)G + h.c. ] . (9.32)<br />

The matrix of oscillation frequencies includes vacuum and first-order<br />

medium contributions. With the momentum-dependent oscillation period<br />

t osc it is<br />

Here,<br />

Ω p = (2π/t osc ) 1 2 v p · σ with v p ≡ (s p , 0, c p ). (9.33)<br />

s p ≡ sin 2θ p and c p ≡ cos 2θ p (9.34)<br />

with the momentum-dependent mixing angle in the medium θ p .<br />

The second approximation <strong>for</strong> the conditions of a SN core is the<br />

weak-damping limit or limit of f<strong>as</strong>t oscillations. It is e<strong>as</strong>y to show that<br />

<strong>for</strong> the relevant physical conditions 2π/t osc is typically much f<strong>as</strong>ter than<br />

the scattering rate. There<strong>for</strong>e, it is justified to consider density matrices<br />

˜ρ p averaged over a period of oscillation. While the ρ p ’s are given by<br />

four real parameters which are functions of time, the ˜ρ p ’s require only<br />

two, <strong>for</strong> example the occupation numbers of the two mixed flavors. It<br />

is straight<strong>for</strong>ward to show that in the weak interaction b<strong>as</strong>is<br />

( f<br />

e )<br />

( )<br />

˜ρ p = p 0<br />

0 1<br />

0 fp<br />

x + 1 t 2 p (fp e − fp)<br />

x , (9.35)<br />

1 0<br />

where t p ≡ tan 2θ p = s p /c p , f e p is the occupation number of ν e , not of<br />

electrons, and f x p refers to a standard or sterile flavor ν x .<br />

One way of looking at the weak-damping limit is that between collisions<br />

neutrinos are best described by “propagation eigenstates,” i.e.<br />

in a b<strong>as</strong>is where the ˜ρ p are diagonal. Then the matrix of coupling constants<br />

G is no longer diagonal and so flavor conversion is understood <strong>as</strong><br />

the result of “flavor-changing neutral currents” where “flavor” refers to<br />

the propagation eigenstates. However, because in general the effective<br />

mixing angle is a function of the neutrino momentum one would have<br />

to use a different b<strong>as</strong>is <strong>for</strong> each momentum, an approach that complicates<br />

rather than simplifies the equations. There<strong>for</strong>e, it is e<strong>as</strong>iest and

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!