28.01.2015 Views

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

418 Chapter 11<br />

per energy interval due to the dominant ν e p reaction in the detectors.<br />

For Kamiokande and IMB an example is shown in Fig. 11.12, b<strong>as</strong>ed<br />

on Burrows’ (1988) model 55 flux calculation which w<strong>as</strong> tuned to fit<br />

the data. The predicted fluence at Earth per unit energy w<strong>as</strong> shown<br />

in Fig. 11.8 where a distance of 50 kpc w<strong>as</strong> adopted. The solid lines<br />

are <strong>for</strong> the c<strong>as</strong>e when the instantaneous ν e spectra are <strong>as</strong>sumed to be<br />

Maxwell-Boltzmann. Of course, the time-integrated flux is then no<br />

longer thermal <strong>as</strong> it is a superposition of Maxwell-Boltzmann spectra<br />

at different temperatures. The solid line leads to a total expectation<br />

of 13.1 events at Kamiokande and 6.3 at IMB. The d<strong>as</strong>hed lines correspond<br />

to spectra which are instantaneously pinched (Fig. 11.6) with<br />

a degeneracy parameter η = 2. Again, the time-integrated spectra are<br />

not necessarily pinched. This c<strong>as</strong>e leads to 11.6 events at Kamiokande<br />

and 3.9 at IMB.<br />

Fig. 11.12. Expected number of events per energy interval at Kamiokande<br />

and IMB from the SN 1987A ν e flux on the b<strong>as</strong>is of the ν e p → ne + reaction.<br />

The flux prediction is b<strong>as</strong>ed on Burrows’ (1988) model 55 which w<strong>as</strong> tuned to<br />

fit the SN 1987A data. The distance is taken to be 50 kpc, and the detector<br />

efficiency curves of Fig. 11.8 are used. The d<strong>as</strong>hed lines refer to neutrino<br />

spectra which are instantaneously “pinched” <strong>as</strong> in Fig. 11.6.<br />

Water Cherenkov detectors, <strong>as</strong> opposed to scintillation ones, are<br />

imaging devices in that they can resolve the direction of the electron<br />

(positron) because of the directionality of the emitted Cherenkov light.<br />

The main limitation is multiple Coulomb scattering of low-energy e ±<br />

in the medium. A typical path length in water is only a few cm so that<br />

hard collisions are relatively unlikely. The rms angular deviation due

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!