28.01.2015 Views

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Processes in a Nuclear Medium 149<br />

and may even decre<strong>as</strong>e at large densities, although such large values <strong>for</strong><br />

Γ σ may never be reached in a nuclear medium <strong>as</strong> will become clear below.<br />

The high-density downturn of the axion emission rate can be interpreted<br />

in terms of the Landau-Pomeranchuk-Migdal effect (Landau<br />

and Pomeranchuk 1953a,b; Feinberg and Pomeranchuk 1956; Migdal<br />

1956) <strong>as</strong> pointed out by Raffelt and Seckel (1991). The main idea is<br />

that collisions interrupt the radiation process. The <strong>for</strong>mation of a radiation<br />

quantum of frequency ω takes about a time ω −1 according to the<br />

uncertainty principle and so if collisions are more frequent than this<br />

time, the radiation process is suppressed. Cl<strong>as</strong>sically, this effect w<strong>as</strong><br />

demonstrated in the language of current correlators in Sect. 4.6.5.<br />

The impact of the high-density behavior of S σ (ω) on the neutralcurrent<br />

neutrino opacity is crudely estimated by the inverse mean free<br />

path given in Eq. (4.35), averaged over a thermal energy spectrum of<br />

the initial neutrino. Moreover, all expressions become much simpler if<br />

one replaces the Fermi-Dirac occupation numbers with the Maxwell-<br />

Boltzmann expression e −ωi/T ; the resulting error is small <strong>for</strong> nondegenerate<br />

neutrinos. The relevant quantity is then<br />

⟨ ⟩ ∫ ∞ ∫ ∞<br />

λ<br />

−1<br />

∝ dω 1 dω 2 ω1 2 ω2 2 e −ω1/T S σ (ω 1 − ω 2 ). (4.74)<br />

0<br />

0<br />

One integral can be done explicitly, leaving one with an integral over<br />

the energy transfer alone. With Eq. (4.72) <strong>for</strong> the structure function<br />

one finds<br />

⟨ ⟩ ∫ ∞<br />

λ<br />

−1<br />

∝ dω Γ σ (T 2 + T ω/2 + ω 2 /12) e −ω/T<br />

. (4.75)<br />

0<br />

ω 2 + Γ 2 /4<br />

This expression is constant <strong>for</strong> Γ σ ≪ T where Γ = Γ σ and thus the<br />

structure function is essentially 2πδ(ω). Indeed, the average scattering<br />

cross section (or mean free path) is not expected to depend on the<br />

density.<br />

For dense media (Γ σ ≫ T ), however, the broadening of S σ (ω) beyond<br />

a delta function leads to a decre<strong>as</strong>ing average scattering rate. This<br />

means that at a fixed temperature the medium becomes more transparent<br />

to neutrinos with incre<strong>as</strong>ing density, even without the impact<br />

of degeneracy effects. This behavior is shown in Fig. 4.9 in analogy to<br />

the axion emission rate Fig. 4.8.<br />

A decre<strong>as</strong>ing cross section is intuitively understood if one recalls<br />

that the nucleon spin is typically flipped in a collision with other nucleons<br />

because the interaction potential couples to the spin. Neutrino scattering<br />

with an energy transfer ω implies that properties of the medium

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!