28.01.2015 Views

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Particle Dispersion and Decays in Media 241<br />

wavefunctions, i.e. Landau levels rather than plane waves, would have<br />

to be used <strong>for</strong> a self-consistent treatment of the photon polarization<br />

tensor and thus, <strong>for</strong> the neutrino coupling to a magnetic field. For a<br />

first discussion see Oraevskiĭ and Semikoz 1991.)<br />

In summary, on the b<strong>as</strong>is of the existing literature it appears that<br />

the medium-induced electromagnetic <strong>for</strong>m factors of neutrinos are of<br />

practical importance only <strong>for</strong> the photon decay process that w<strong>as</strong> discussed<br />

in the previous section.<br />

6.7 Neutrino Refraction<br />

6.7.1 Neutrino Refractive Index<br />

When neutrinos propagate in a medium they will experience a shift of<br />

their energy, similar to photon refraction, due to their coherent interaction<br />

with the medium constituents (Wolfenstein 1978). The neutrino<br />

refractive index can be calculated in the same way <strong>as</strong> that <strong>for</strong> any<br />

other particle which propagates in a medium, namely on the b<strong>as</strong>is of<br />

the <strong>for</strong>ward scattering amplitudes <strong>as</strong> discussed in Sect. 6.2.1. As one<br />

needs only <strong>for</strong>ward scattering, and <strong>as</strong> the relevant medium constituents<br />

are protons, neutrons, electrons, and possibly other neutrinos, only the<br />

Feynman graphs of Fig. 6.15 need to be considered. 38<br />

In most situations of practical interest the energies of the neutrinos<br />

and of the medium particles are much smaller than the W and Z m<strong>as</strong>s<br />

(80.2 and 91.2 GeV) so that the energy and momentum transferred by<br />

the gauge bosons is always much less than their m<strong>as</strong>s. 39 This justifies<br />

to expand their propagators (energy-momentum transfer Q) <strong>as</strong><br />

D µν (Q) = g µν<br />

m 2 Z,W<br />

+ Q2 g µν − Q µ Q ν<br />

m 4 Z,W<br />

+ . . . (6.104)<br />

and keep only the first term. (The second term is needed if the contribution<br />

of the first one cancels <strong>as</strong> in a CP symmetric medium—see<br />

38 In the <strong>for</strong>malism of finite temperature and density (FTD) field theory the amplitudes<br />

may be written in a more compact <strong>for</strong>m so that the relevant Feynman<br />

graphs reduce to a tadpole and a bubble graph (Nötzold and Raffelt 1988; Nieves<br />

1989; Pal and Pham 1989). Apart from a more compact notation, however, the<br />

FTD <strong>for</strong>malism leads to the same expressions <strong>as</strong> the “pedestrian” approach chosen<br />

here.<br />

39 See however Learned and Pakv<strong>as</strong>a (1995) <strong>as</strong> well <strong>as</strong> Domokos and Kovesi-<br />

Domokos (1995) <strong>for</strong> a discussion of the oscillations of very high-energy cosmic neutrinos<br />

<strong>for</strong> which this approximation is not adequate.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!