28.01.2015 Views

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Solar Neutrinos 393<br />

flux above its threshold of 2.2 MeV, independently of the occurrence of<br />

oscillations. The main problem here is the me<strong>as</strong>urement of the finalstate<br />

neutron by the detection of γ rays from the subsequent neutron<br />

capture, or by a neutron detector array in the heavy water. Ultrapure<br />

water, acrylic, and other materials are needed to prevent an excessive<br />

radioactive background that would spoil this me<strong>as</strong>urement. One anticipates<br />

to obtain the full unsuppressed 8 B flux with a precision of<br />

about 1% after 5 years of operation. The me<strong>as</strong>ured ratio between the<br />

charged-current and neutral-current deuterium disintegration will give<br />

an immediate me<strong>as</strong>ure of the electron survival probability and thus of<br />

the occurrence of neutrino oscillations.<br />

If spin or spin-flavor oscillations occur such that a sizeable ν e flux<br />

is produced, it can be detected by the reaction ν e + d → n + n + e +<br />

which produces three detectable particles (Balantekin and Loreti 1992).<br />

Of course, a possible ν e flux is already constrained by Kamiokande<br />

(Fig. 10.14), and can be detected or constrained by Superkamiokande.<br />

Suggestions <strong>for</strong> solar model independent methods of analyzing future<br />

solar neutrino data were made, <strong>for</strong> example, by Spiro and Vignaud<br />

(1990), Bilenky and Giunti (1993, 1994), and C<strong>as</strong>tellani et al. (1994).<br />

10.9.3 BOREXINO<br />

Superkamiokande and SNO are both limited to a me<strong>as</strong>urement of the<br />

boron neutrino flux because of their relatively high detection thresholds.<br />

If the boron flux is partly or mostly suppressed by a low S 17 factor or<br />

a low central solar temperature instead of neutrino oscillations these<br />

experiments may have difficulties at identifying oscillations which would<br />

still be indicated by the missing beryllium neutrino flux. There<strong>for</strong>e, it is<br />

interesting that another experiment (BOREXINO 60 ) is being prepared<br />

which would be sensitive dominantly to the beryllium neutrinos.<br />

The main detection reaction is el<strong>as</strong>tic ν-e scattering <strong>as</strong> in the lightwater<br />

Cherenkov detectors. However, the kicked electron is detected by<br />

virtue of scintillation light rather than Cherenkov radiation, the <strong>for</strong>mer<br />

60 The name of this experiment is derived from BOREX (boron solar neutrino<br />

experiment), a proposed detector that w<strong>as</strong> to use 11 B <strong>as</strong> a target (Raghavan, Pakv<strong>as</strong>a,<br />

and Brown 1986; see also Bahcall 1989). For a practical implementation it<br />

w<strong>as</strong> envisaged to use a boron loaded liquid scintillator (e.g. Raghavan 1990); because<br />

of the relatively small size of this detector the Italian diminutive BOREXINO<br />

(baby BOREX) emerged. Ultimately, the idea of using a borated scintillator w<strong>as</strong><br />

dropped entirely, leaving boron only in the name of the experiment. Confusingly,<br />

then, BOREXINO is unrelated to a boron target, and also unrelated to the solar<br />

boron neutrinos because the experiment is designed to hunt the beryllium ones.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!