28.01.2015 Views

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Supernova Neutrinos 409<br />

must then be multiplied with a factor between 4 and 6 to obtain an<br />

estimate of E b .<br />

Even though the emission of neutrinos is a qu<strong>as</strong>ithermal process<br />

their energies are not set at the “neutrino sphere” which is defined<br />

to be the approximate shell from where they can escape without substantial<br />

further diffusion. Of course, even the notion of a neutrino<br />

sphere is a crude concept because of the Eν 2 dependence of the scattering<br />

cross section on nonrelativistic nucleons which implies that there is<br />

a separate neutrino sphere <strong>for</strong> each energy group. The scattering with<br />

nucleons does not allow <strong>for</strong> much energy transfer apart from recoil effects.<br />

What is relevant <strong>for</strong> determining the neutrino energies is their<br />

“energy sphere” where they l<strong>as</strong>t exchanged energy by the scattering on<br />

electrons, by pair processes, and by charged-current absorption. Naturally,<br />

this region lies interior to the neutrino sphere—see the shaded<br />

are<strong>as</strong> in Fig. 11.1 <strong>as</strong> opposed to the dotted line which represents the<br />

neutrino sphere.<br />

The concept of an “energy sphere” (where neutrinos l<strong>as</strong>t exchanged<br />

energy with the medium) and of a “transport sphere” (beyond which<br />

they can stream off without further scattering) helps to explain the<br />

apparent paradox that the ν µ spectrum is, say, twice <strong>as</strong> hard <strong>as</strong> that<br />

of ν e , yet the same amount of energy is radiated. Both fluxes originate<br />

from the same radius of about 15 km so that the Stefan-Boltzmann<br />

law (L ∝ R 2 T 4 ) would seem to indicate that the ν µ flux should carry<br />

16 times <strong>as</strong> much energy. However, the place to which the Stefan-<br />

Boltzmann law should be applied is the energy sphere, yet the neutrinos<br />

cannot escape from there because the flow is impeded by neutral-current<br />

scattering on an overburden of nucleons. One may crudely think of the<br />

energy sphere being covered with a skin that does not allow the radiation<br />

to stream off except through some holes. Thus the effectively<br />

radiating surface is smaller than 4πR 2 . (For a more technical elaboration<br />

of this argument see Janka 1995a.)<br />

Evidently, neutrino transport is a rather complicated problem, especially<br />

in the transition region between diffusion and free escape. The<br />

most accurate numerical way to implement it would be a Monte Carlo<br />

integration of the Boltzmann collision equation (Janka and Hillebrandt<br />

1989a,b). In practice, this is not possible because of the constraints<br />

imposed by the limited speed of present-day computers so that a variety<br />

of approximation methods are used to solve this problem. While<br />

there is broad agreement on the general features of the expected neutrino<br />

signal, there remain differences between the predicted spectra and<br />

lightcurves of different authors.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!