28.01.2015 Views

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Supernova Neutrinos 433<br />

ber of ν e ’s in the burst is of order 10 56 , its duration of order 50 ms. Thus,<br />

while it p<strong>as</strong>ses it represents a ν e density of about 10 32 cm −3 r7 −2 which<br />

exceeds the local electron density <strong>for</strong> r > ∼ 10 9 cm. However, the ph<strong>as</strong>espace<br />

distribution of the neutrinos is locally far from isotropic and so<br />

the energy shift involves a factor ⟨1 − cos Θ⟩ where Θ is the angle between<br />

the “test neutrino” and a “background neutrino;” the average is<br />

to be taken over all background neutrinos (Sect. 9.3.2). A typical angle<br />

between two neutrinos moving within the burst at the same location<br />

is given by the angle subtended by the neutrino sphere <strong>as</strong> viewed from<br />

the relevant radial position, i.e. Θ ≈ R/r with R the radius of the neutrino<br />

sphere. For a large r one thus finds ⟨1 − cos Θ⟩ ≈ Θ 2 ≈ (R/r) 2 .<br />

Then, with R ≈ 10 7 cm the effective neutrino density is approximately<br />

10 32 cm −3 r7 −4 , a value which is always smaller than the electron density<br />

Eq. (11.11). There<strong>for</strong>e, in the present context one may ignore neutrinoneutrino<br />

interactions. This will not be the c<strong>as</strong>e <strong>for</strong> the issue of r-process<br />

nucleosynthesis (Sect. 11.4.5).<br />

One may proceed to determine the MSW triangle <strong>as</strong> in Fig. 8.9<br />

<strong>for</strong> solar neutrinos, except that there an exponential electron density<br />

profile w<strong>as</strong> used while now Eq. (11.11) pertains. Nötzold (1987) found<br />

a conversion probability in excess of 50% if<br />

∆m 2 ν sin 3 2θ ∼ > 4×10 −9 eV 2 E ν /10 MeV, (11.12)<br />

<strong>as</strong>suming that ∆m 2 < ν ∼ 3×10 4 eV 2 E ν /10 MeV so that a resonance can<br />

occur outside of the neutrino sphere. The region in the ∆m 2 ν-sin 2 2θplane<br />

(mixing angle θ) with a conversion probability exceeding 50% <strong>for</strong><br />

E ν = 20 MeV is shown <strong>as</strong> a shaded area in Fig. 11.17, together with<br />

the MSW solutions to the solar neutrino problem. For orientation, the<br />

Kamiokande-allowed range <strong>for</strong> solar neutrinos is also indicated.<br />

The solar small-angle MSW solution would seem to have a small<br />

impact on the prompt ν e burst from a collapsing star. Thus, the first<br />

Kamiokande SN 1987A event may still be interpreted <strong>as</strong> a prompt ν e ,<br />

and one may well observe nearly the full ν e burst from a future SN.<br />

It is interesting that the MSW triangle <strong>for</strong> the prompt ν e burst<br />

reaches to relatively large neutrino m<strong>as</strong>ses. In the 3−30 eV regime neutrino<br />

m<strong>as</strong>ses would play an important cosmological role <strong>as</strong> dark matter<br />

and <strong>for</strong> the <strong>for</strong>mation of structure in the universe. Such m<strong>as</strong>sive neutrinos<br />

likely would mix with ν e . Unless the mixing angle is very small<br />

the appearance of an unoscillated prompt ν e burst from a stellar collapse<br />

would be in conflict with a cosmological role of m<strong>as</strong>sive neutrinos<br />

(Arafune et al. 1987b).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!