28.01.2015 Views

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

426 Chapter 11<br />

neutrino-sphere radius of 18 km and the inferred total binding energy<br />

of 3.08×10 53 erg correspond much better to theoretical expectations.<br />

Perhaps this finding can be taken <strong>as</strong> a hint that the delayed-explosion<br />

scenario with a significant matter accretion ph<strong>as</strong>e is favored by the SN<br />

1987A data over a prompt-explosion picture.<br />

In Loredo and Lamb’s best-fit two-component model the Kelvin-<br />

Helmholtz signal is described by a “displaced power law” cooling model<br />

with a neutrino sphere of fixed radius R and thermal neutrino emission<br />

with T (t) = T 0 /(1 + t/3τ). It turns out that the luminosity, which is<br />

proportional to T 4 , follows a surprisingly similar curve to the exponential<br />

e −t/τ so that the parameter τ h<strong>as</strong> practically the same meaning<br />

<strong>as</strong> be<strong>for</strong>e. ⟨E νe ⟩ <strong>for</strong> the time-integrated flux is given by 2.13 T 0 , very<br />

similar to 2.36 T 0 <strong>for</strong> the exponential. In Fig. 11.16 the 68% and 95%<br />

credible regions are shown in the T 0 -τ-plane. While the best-fit value<br />

is not too different from the single-component exponential model of<br />

Fig. 11.15, the 95% credible region is much larger, including the lowest<br />

values of the typical theoretical ⟨E νe ⟩ predictions quoted in Eq. (11.4).<br />

11.3.4 Neutrino M<strong>as</strong>s and Pulse Duration<br />

Zatsepin (1968) w<strong>as</strong> the first to point out that the ν e burst expected<br />

from stellar collapse offers a possibility to me<strong>as</strong>ure or constrain small<br />

neutrino m<strong>as</strong>ses. Because a neutrino with m<strong>as</strong>s m ν travels slower than<br />

the speed of light its arrival at Earth will be delayed by<br />

∆t = 2.57 s<br />

( D<br />

50 kpc<br />

) (10 MeV<br />

E ν<br />

) 2 ( ) mν 2<br />

. (11.9)<br />

10 eV<br />

Because the me<strong>as</strong>ured ν e ’s from SN 1987A were registered within a few<br />

seconds and had energies in the 10 MeV range, the m νe m<strong>as</strong>s is limited<br />

to less than about 10 eV.<br />

A detailed study must proceed along the lines of the maximumlikelihood<br />

analysis of Loredo and Lamb (1989, 1995) quoted in the<br />

previous section where the detector background is included, and such<br />

parameters <strong>as</strong> the unknown offset times between the detectors are left<br />

unconstrained. Including the possibility that some of the registered<br />

events are due to background is particularly important because the<br />

neutrino m<strong>as</strong>s limit is very sensitive to the early low-energy events at<br />

Kamiokande which have a relatively high chance of being due to background.<br />

Loredo and Lamb (1989) found a vanishing best-fit neutrino<br />

m<strong>as</strong>s and a 95% CL upper limit of m νe < 23 eV. This bound is less<br />

restrictive than limits found by previous authors on the b<strong>as</strong>is of less

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!