28.01.2015 Views

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Radiative Particle Decays 477<br />

Fig. 12.15. (The overall factor m −1<br />

ν of Eq. 12.32 is not included, of<br />

course.) Up to neutrino m<strong>as</strong>ses of about 10 MeV one may essentially<br />

ignore the nonrelativistic corrections while <strong>for</strong> larger m<strong>as</strong>ses one h<strong>as</strong> to<br />

worry about them. However, because this discussion applies to standard<br />

neutrinos, the largest relevant m<strong>as</strong>s is about 24 MeV and so the<br />

nonrelativistic corrections never overwhelm the result.<br />

12.4.6 Summary of ν → ν ′ γ Limits<br />

In order to summarize the decay limits I begin in Fig. 12.16 with the relevant<br />

regimes of m ν and τ tot . Above the upper dotted line the neutrinos<br />

live long enough so that most of them p<strong>as</strong>s the Earth be<strong>for</strong>e decaying<br />

while below the lower dotted line they decay within the envelope of<br />

the progenitor star. In the are<strong>as</strong> 1 and 5 the photon burst is “short”<br />

(∆t < γ ∼ 10 s), in 2 and 4 it is “intermediate” (10 s < ∼ ∆t < γ ∼ 223.2 s),<br />

and in 3 it is “long” (223.2 s < ∼ ∆t γ ). The exact boundaries <strong>as</strong> well <strong>as</strong><br />

the relevant constraints are summarized in Tab. 12.2. In Fig. 12.17 the<br />

limits on µ eff are summarized <strong>as</strong> a contour plot.<br />

If one restricts possible neutrino decays to the radiative channel one<br />

h<strong>as</strong> τ tot = τ γ which depends only on µ eff and m ν . Then one may use<br />

directly the upper limits on µ eff given in Tab. 12.2 <strong>for</strong> the are<strong>as</strong> 1−3,<br />

depending on the <strong>as</strong>sumed m<strong>as</strong>s. Put another way, the conditions on<br />

τ tot are then automatically satisfied.<br />

These limits certainly apply to ν e <strong>as</strong> the ν e burst from SN 1987A h<strong>as</strong><br />

been me<strong>as</strong>ured. The fluxes of the other flavors were only theoretically<br />

implied. If they have only standard weak interactions they must have<br />

been emitted approximately with the same efficiency <strong>as</strong> ν e . Large dipole<br />

moments, however, imply large nonstandard interactions: The same<br />

electromagnetic interaction vertex that allows <strong>for</strong> radiative decays also<br />

allows <strong>for</strong> scattering on charged particles by photon exchange! For<br />

MeV energies, <strong>for</strong> example, the scattering cross section on electrons by<br />

regular weak interactions and that by photon exchange are the same<br />

<strong>for</strong> µ eff of order 10 −10 µ B . Hence in the lower left corner of Fig. 12.17<br />

the neutrinos would interact much more strongly by photon exchange<br />

than by ordinary weak interactions, causing them to emerge from higher<br />

layers of the SN core than normally <strong>as</strong>sumed. Their fluence and effective<br />

temperature is then much smaller than standard. Put another way, <strong>for</strong><br />

µ > eff ∼ 10 −10 µ B the above constraints are not self-consistent (Hatsuda,<br />

Lim, and Yoshimura 1988). However, because large dipole moments can<br />

be constrained by other methods (Sect. 7.5.1) a detailed investigation<br />

of their impact on SN physics is not warranted.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!