28.01.2015 Views

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

What Have We Learned from SN 1987A 501<br />

with K = 0 representing the Lorentzian, K = 1 the Galilean law of<br />

adding velocities. For photons, the most stringent laboratory bound is<br />

K < γ ∼ 10 −4 derived from the time of flight of decay photons π ◦ → 2γ<br />

from a pulsed π ◦ source (Alväger et al. 1964). A much more stringent<br />

constraint (K < γ ∼ 2×10 −9 ) obtains from an analysis of the photon signal<br />

from a pulsed x-ray source (Brecher 1977).<br />

The absence of dispersion of the ν e pulse can be used to derive constraints<br />

on K ν (Atzmon and Nussinov 1994). The observed SN 1987A<br />

neutrinos were produced by microscopic processes involving nearly relativistic<br />

nucleons, and subsequently scattered several times on such<br />

nucleons be<strong>for</strong>e leaving the star. If the l<strong>as</strong>t nucleon on which they<br />

scatter is considered the source with v S ≈ 0.2 c their laboratory speed<br />

c ′ ν will be represented by a distribution of approximate width 0.2 K ν<br />

around c because of the random orientation and distribution in magnitude<br />

of v S . Thus one derives a bound K < ν ∼ 10 −11 from the absence of<br />

a spread in arrival times exceeding about 10 s.<br />

Atzmon and Nussinov (1994) warn, however, that this simple argument<br />

may be too naive <strong>as</strong> the motion through the progenitor’s envelope<br />

may cause the particles of the envelope to be the true source of<br />

the “neutrino waves” <strong>as</strong> there is a substantial amount of refraction between<br />

the neutrino sphere and the stellar surface. If one follows Atzmon<br />

and Nussinov’s re<strong>as</strong>oning, there remains only a much weaker bound of<br />

K < ν ∼ 10 −5 from the absence of an anomalous time delay between the<br />

neutrino signal and the optical sighting of the SN.<br />

13.4 Duration of Neutrino Emission<br />

13.4.1 General Argument<br />

The most intricate way to use SN 1987A <strong>as</strong> a laboratory arises from the<br />

observed duration of neutrino cooling. While the neutrino luminosity<br />

during the first few 100 ms until the shock h<strong>as</strong> been revived is largely<br />

powered by accretion and by the contraction and settling of the bloated<br />

outer core, the long tail is <strong>as</strong>sociated with cooling, i.e. emission from<br />

the neutrino sphere which is powered by energy originally stored deep<br />

in the inner core. If a direct cooling channel existed <strong>for</strong> that region,<br />

such <strong>as</strong> the emission of r.h. neutrinos or axions, the late cooling ph<strong>as</strong>e<br />

would be deprived of energy. Put another way, a novel cooling channel<br />

from the inner core would leave the schematic neutrino light curves<br />

of Fig. 11.3 more or less unchanged be<strong>for</strong>e about 1 s while the long<br />

Kelvin-Helmholtz cooling ph<strong>as</strong>e would be curtailed.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!