28.01.2015 Views

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

106 Chapter 3<br />

The factors F + and F − are of order unity. Dicus et al. (1976) derived<br />

analytic expressions in terms of a screening scale and the Fermi<br />

velocity of the electrons. In fact, because F − is always much smaller<br />

than F + and C 2 V − C 2 A is much smaller than C 2 V + C 2 A, the “minus”<br />

term may be neglected entirely. There<strong>for</strong>e, the Dicus et al. (1976) result<br />

is identical with that of Festa and Ruderman (1969). Either one<br />

is correct only within a factor of order unity because Eq. (6.61) w<strong>as</strong><br />

used <strong>as</strong> a screening prescription with the Thom<strong>as</strong>-Fermi wave number<br />

<strong>as</strong> a screening scale. However, in a degenerate medium electrons never<br />

dominate screening. The most important effect is from the ion correlations<br />

which, in a weakly coupled pl<strong>as</strong>ma (Γ ∼ < 1), can be included by<br />

Eq. (6.72) with the Debye scale k i of the ions <strong>as</strong> a screening scale. While<br />

it is e<strong>as</strong>y to replace k TF with k i in these results, the modification of the<br />

Coulomb propagator according to Eq. (6.72) cannot be implemented<br />

without redoing the entire calculation.<br />

A systematic approach to include ion correlations (i.e. screening<br />

effects) w<strong>as</strong> pioneered by Flowers (1973, 1974) who showed clearly how<br />

to separate the ion correlation effects in the <strong>for</strong>m of a dynamic structure<br />

factor from the matrix element of the electrons and neutrinos. This<br />

approach also allows one to include lattice vibrations when the ions<br />

<strong>for</strong>m a crystal in a strongly coupled pl<strong>as</strong>ma. In a series of papers Itoh<br />

and Kohyama (1983), Itoh et al. (1984a,b), and Munakata, Kohyama,<br />

and Itoh (1987) followed this approach and calculated the emission rate<br />

<strong>for</strong> all conditions and chemical compositions.<br />

As an estimate, good to within a factor of order unity, one may use<br />

F + = 1 and F − = 0. Moreover, inspired by the axion results one can<br />

guess a simple expression which can be tested against the numerical<br />

rates of Itoh and Kohyama (1983). I find that F − = 0 and<br />

F + ≈ ln<br />

( 2 + κ<br />

2<br />

κ 2 )<br />

+ κ2<br />

2 + κ 2 (3.42)<br />

is a re<strong>as</strong>onable fit even <strong>for</strong> strongly coupled conditions (Appendix C).<br />

3.5.4 Neutron-Star Crust<br />

The degenerate bremsstrahlung emission of νν pairs is relevant in such<br />

diverse environments <strong>as</strong> the cores of low-m<strong>as</strong>s red giants, white dwarfs,<br />

and in neutron-star crusts. Pethick and Thorsson (1994) noted that<br />

in the latter c<strong>as</strong>e the medium is so dense that band-structure effects<br />

of the electrons become important. The band separations can be up

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!