28.01.2015 Views

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Nonstandard Neutrinos 271<br />

component, a Pauli two-spinor ϕ, which is then found to evolve <strong>as</strong><br />

i∂ t ϕ = (µB 0 + ϵE 0 ) · σ ϕ, (7.23)<br />

where the index 0 refers to quantities in the neutrino rest frame. A<br />

neutrino polarized in or opposite to the field direction h<strong>as</strong> the energy<br />

±µB 0 or ±ϵE 0 , respectively, so that µ and ϵ are indeed magnetic and<br />

electric dipole moments, respectively.<br />

The electromagnetic <strong>for</strong>m factors obey certain constraints <strong>for</strong> Dirac<br />

and Majorana neutrinos; detailed discussions were provided by a number<br />

of authors. 45 For Dirac neutrinos, all <strong>for</strong>m factors must be real<br />

relative to each other (no relative ph<strong>as</strong>es) if CP invariance holds. For<br />

the diagonal c<strong>as</strong>e (coupling to one neutrino species) all <strong>for</strong>m factors<br />

must be real, and CP invariance implies that the electric dipole moment<br />

must vanish. For Majorana neutrinos, a magnetic transition moment<br />

(F 2 ) must be imaginary, an electric transition moment (G 2 ) real. If<br />

CP invariance holds, in addition one of them must vanish, i.e. there is<br />

either a transition electric, or a transition magnetic moment, but not<br />

both. Majorana neutrinos cannot have diagonal electric nor magnetic<br />

moments, nor can they have a charge or charge radius; they may have<br />

an anapole <strong>for</strong>m factor.<br />

7.3.3 Two-Photon Coupling<br />

Discussions of neutrino electromagnetic <strong>for</strong>m factors are usually restricted<br />

to the effective neutrino coupling to an electromagnetic wave<br />

or static field. However, a two-photon coupling of neutrinos is also possible<br />

and of some interest. Historically, it w<strong>as</strong> thought <strong>for</strong> some time<br />

that the process γγ → νν could be of great importance <strong>for</strong> the emission<br />

of neutrinos from stars until it w<strong>as</strong> shown by Gell-Mann (1961)<br />

that the amplitude <strong>for</strong> this process vanishes identically if neutrinos<br />

have only l.h. local interactions with electrons. Several authors discussed<br />

the γγ → νν process when neutrinos are m<strong>as</strong>sive, or when they<br />

have more general interaction structures (Halprin 1975; Fischbach et al.<br />

1976, 1977; Natale, Pleitez, and Tacla 1987; Gregores et al. 1995). However,<br />

there does not seem to be a plausible scenario where this process<br />

would be of serious <strong>as</strong>trophysical interest.<br />

In the standard model, there is an effective two-photon coupling<br />

to neutrinos because the interaction is not local; rather, it is mediated<br />

by finite-m<strong>as</strong>s gauge bosons. Early calculations of the effective<br />

45 For example Nieves (1982), Kayser (1982), Shrock (1982), and Li and Wilczek<br />

(1982).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!