28.01.2015 Views

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

160 Chapter 4<br />

4.10 Emission of Right-Handed Dirac Neutrinos<br />

So far in this chapter neutrinos were <strong>as</strong>sumed to be m<strong>as</strong>sless particles<br />

which interact only by the standard left-handed weak current. It<br />

is possible, however, that neutrinos have a Dirac m<strong>as</strong>s in which c<strong>as</strong>e<br />

any reaction with a final-state (anti)neutrino produces both positive<br />

and negative helicity states. Typically, the “wrong-helicity” states will<br />

emerge in a fraction (m ν /2E ν ) 2 of all c<strong>as</strong>es because of the mismatch<br />

between chirality (eigenstates of γ 5 ) and helicity. For E ν ≫ m ν the<br />

wrong-helicity states correspond approximately to right-handed chirality<br />

states and so their interaction-rate with the ambient medium is<br />

weaker by an approximate factor (m ν /2E ν ) 2 . This implies that <strong>for</strong> a<br />

sufficiently small m<strong>as</strong>s they would not be trapped in a SN core and<br />

thus carry away energy in an “invisible” channel, allowing one to set<br />

constraints on a Dirac neutrino m<strong>as</strong>s from the observed neutrino signal<br />

of SN 1987A (Sect. 13.8.1). Here, the relationship between the production<br />

rate of left- and right-handed neutrinos is explored in some<br />

detail because the simple scaling with (m ν /2E ν ) 2 is not correct in<br />

all c<strong>as</strong>es.<br />

When a neutrino interacts with a medium the transition probability<br />

from a state with four-momentum K 1 = (ω 1 , k 1 ) to one with K 2 =<br />

(ω 2 , k 2 ) is written <strong>as</strong> W (K 1 , K 2 ). The function W is defined <strong>for</strong> both<br />

positive and negative energies. The emission probability <strong>for</strong> a pair<br />

ν(K 1 )ν(K 2 ) is then W (−K 1 , K 2 ), the absorption probability <strong>for</strong> a pair<br />

is W (K 1 , −K 2 ). The collisional rate of change of the occupation number<br />

f k1 of a neutrino field mode k 1 is then given by<br />

df k1<br />

dt<br />

=<br />

∣ coll<br />

∫ d 3 k 2<br />

(2π) 3 [<br />

WK2 ,K 1<br />

f k2 (1 − f k1 ) − W K1 ,K 2<br />

f k1 (1 − f k2 )<br />

+ W −K2 ,K 1<br />

(1 − f k1 )(1 − f k2<br />

) − W K1 ,−K 2<br />

f k1 f k2<br />

]<br />

, (4.87)<br />

where the variables of W were written <strong>as</strong> subscripts. The first term<br />

corresponds to neutrino scatterings into the mode k 1 from all other<br />

modes, the second term is scattering out of mode k 1 into all other<br />

modes, the third term is pair production with a final-state neutrino k 1 ,<br />

and the fourth term is pair absorption of a neutrino of momentum k 1<br />

and an antineutrino of any momentum. f k is the occupation number<br />

<strong>for</strong> the antineutrino mode k; (1−f k ) or (1−f k ) represent Pauli blocking<br />

factors. This collision integral only includes (effective) neutral-current<br />

processes while charged-current reactions were ignored.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!