28.01.2015 Views

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

What Have We Learned from SN 1987A 517<br />

could produce these “wrong-helicity” states. 86 The main possibilities<br />

are the existence of novel r.h. interactions which couple directly to r.h.<br />

neutrinos, the existence of neutrino magnetic or electric dipole moments<br />

which allow <strong>for</strong> left-right scatterings or magnetic oscillations, and the<br />

existence of neutrino Dirac m<strong>as</strong>ses. Of course, these possibilities are<br />

not necessarily distinct <strong>as</strong> the existence of r.h. currents or a Dirac m<strong>as</strong>s<br />

would usually also induce magnetic dipole moments.<br />

Beginning with the <strong>as</strong>sumption that neutrinos have a Dirac m<strong>as</strong>s,<br />

the mismatch between chirality and helicity <strong>for</strong> m<strong>as</strong>sive fermions implies<br />

that in purely l.h. interactions a final-state neutrino or antineutrino<br />

sometimes h<strong>as</strong> the “wrong” helicity and thus nearly r.h. chirality.<br />

Then it is essentially noninteracting and thus may escape almost freely.<br />

In principle, there are two production channels, the spin-flip scattering<br />

of trapped l.h. states, and the production of pairs ν L ν R or ν R ν L by<br />

the medium. In Sect. 4.10 it w<strong>as</strong> shown that the neutrino ph<strong>as</strong>e space<br />

favors the spin-flip process by a large margin. Moreover, in a nonrelativistic<br />

medium the spin-flip scattering rate w<strong>as</strong> found to be simply<br />

the nonflip scattering rate times the factor (m ν /2E ν ) 2 . The energyloss<br />

rate w<strong>as</strong> then given by Q scat in Eq. (4.94) in terms of a dynamic<br />

structure function of the medium. 87<br />

In a dilute medium consisting of only one species of nucleons one<br />

h<strong>as</strong> S(ω) = (CV 2 + 3CA) 2 2πδ(ω), leading to an energy-loss rate of<br />

ϵ R = 3(C2 V + 3CA) 2 G 2 Fm 2 νT 4<br />

2π 3 m N<br />

( )<br />

≈ 0.7×10 19 erg g −1 s −1 mν 2 ( )<br />

T 4<br />

, (13.14)<br />

30 keV 30 MeV<br />

where C 2 V +3C 2 A ≈ 1 w<strong>as</strong> used (see Appendix B). Even though the axialvector<br />

structure function is not a δ function, Eq. (13.14) is probably a<br />

re<strong>as</strong>onable estimate because the results of the previous section indicate<br />

that the neutrino scattering rate in a dense medium is probably not<br />

86 Such bounds naturally can be avoided if one <strong>as</strong>sumes that the r.h. neutrinos<br />

have other novel interactions which are strong enough to trap them efficiently in a<br />

SN core. Explicit models were constructed, <strong>for</strong> example, by Babu, Mohapatra, and<br />

Rothstein (1992) or Rajpoot (1993). These authors aimed at avoiding the SN 1987A<br />

bound on Dirac neutrino m<strong>as</strong>ses.<br />

87 Besides the neutrino spin-flip rate due to the neutrino weak interactions with<br />

nucleons or other particles, there is also a spin-flip scattering term in the gravitational<br />

field of the entire neutron star (Choudhury, Hari D<strong>as</strong>s, and Murthy 1989).<br />

However, the resulting energy loss w<strong>as</strong> found to be small except <strong>for</strong> low-energy<br />

neutrinos.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!