28.01.2015 Views

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Neutrinos: The Bottom Line 575<br />

is dominated by the pl<strong>as</strong>mon decay process γ → νν <strong>for</strong> a large range<br />

of stellar conditions (Appendix C). This process occurs mostly by the<br />

vector-current coupling to electrons of the medium. Because the weak<br />

mixing angle h<strong>as</strong> the special value sin 2 Θ W = 0.23 ≈ 1 the vectorcurrent<br />

coupling of ν µ and ν τ to electrons nearly vanishes (Appendix B)<br />

4<br />

and so γ → ν µ ν µ and ν τ ν τ plays near to no role anyway—in this sense<br />

stars are “blind” to the issue of heavy ν µ or ν τ m<strong>as</strong>ses.<br />

However, <strong>as</strong>suming that the heavy neutrinos are Dirac particles one<br />

can limit their m<strong>as</strong>s by a SN argument: The energy loss by right-handed<br />

states produced in spin-flip collisions must not be too large, yielding a<br />

limit of m < ν ∼ 30 keV (Sect. 13.8.1). In addition, these neutrinos have<br />

very high energies, typical of SN core temperatures, and so their decays<br />

might produce high-energy daughter ν e ’s (100−200 MeV) which were<br />

not observed from SN 1987A (Sect. 13.8.1).<br />

Even Majorana neutrinos would not be harmless <strong>for</strong> SN physics if<br />

they would mix sufficiently strongly with ν e . In this c<strong>as</strong>e they would<br />

effectively participate in β equilibrium (Sect. 9.5) so that the spinflip<br />

scattering of, say, ν τ would effectively lead to ν τ ’s and thus to<br />

deleptonization without the need of transporting lepton number to the<br />

stellar surface.<br />

In addition, even though heavy Majorana neutrinos would be emitted<br />

from the neutrino sphere so that their decays would not produce<br />

high-energy daughter products, the decays could still add to the detectable<br />

signal. It is not obvious from the existing literature which<br />

(if any) range of m<strong>as</strong>ses and decay times is ruled out or ruled in by the<br />

SN 1987A observations (Sect. 13.2.2).<br />

If the f<strong>as</strong>t decays were due to some sort of majoron model, large<br />

“secret” neutrino-neutrino interactions are conceivable, possibly in conjunction<br />

with a small vacuum expectation value of a new Higgs field so<br />

that the symmetry may be restored in a SN core. While a substantial<br />

body of literature exists on this sort of scenario (Sect. 15.7.2) I believe<br />

that in this context the story of SN physics would have to be rewritten<br />

more systematically than h<strong>as</strong> been done so far. However, there appears<br />

to be little doubt that <strong>for</strong> neutrino-majoron Yukawa couplings in excess<br />

of about 10 −5 one would expect dramatic modifications of the transport<br />

of energy and lepton number.<br />

In summary, “heavy” neutrinos with f<strong>as</strong>t invisible decays are a way<br />

to circumvent the cosmological m<strong>as</strong>s limit, and may indeed be desirable<br />

in certain scenarios of cosmic structure <strong>for</strong>mation. Depending on their<br />

detailed properties they could have a substantial impact on SN physics<br />

and the signal observable in a detector. It is difficult, however, to

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!