28.01.2015 Views

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Anomalous Stellar Energy Losses Bounded by Observations 51<br />

F which includes Coulomb screening by ion correlations and electron<br />

relativistic corrections one may e<strong>as</strong>ily “integrate” over the entire star.<br />

For an <strong>as</strong>sumed equal mixture of carbon and oxygen one finds <strong>for</strong> the<br />

luminosity in pseudoscalar “exotica”<br />

L x = α 26 2.0×10 −3 L ⊙ (M/M ⊙ ) ⟨F ⟩ T 4 7 , (2.12)<br />

where α 26 = α ′ /10 −26 and T 7 = T/10 7 K (internal temperature T ).<br />

Further, ⟨F ⟩ ≈ 1.0 within a few 10% (Sect. 3.5.2).<br />

This energy-loss rate varies with internal temperature almost <strong>as</strong><br />

the surface photon luminosity of Eq. (2.7). If L x dominates in Mestel’s<br />

cooling law Eq. (2.11) the slope 10 M 35 bol is replaced with the almost<br />

identical value 12 M 35 bol. Thus, <strong>for</strong> a given WD birthrate the main<br />

impact of pseudoscalars is to reduce the amplitude of the luminosity<br />

function. Conversely, the inferred birthrate is larger by about a factor<br />

1 + L x /L γ ≈ 1 + α 26 . Because the <strong>for</strong>mation rate of planetary nebulae,<br />

the progenitors of WDs, agrees with the standard inferred birthrate to<br />

within a factor of about 2, one finds α < 26 ∼ 1. 9<br />

The observed break of the luminosity function at the faint end<br />

(Fig. 2.10) h<strong>as</strong> been interpreted <strong>as</strong> the beginning of WD <strong>for</strong>mation.<br />

If boson cooling were dominant the faintest luminosities would have<br />

been reached in a shorter amount of time, reducing the inferred age of<br />

the galactic disk; standard cooling implies t gal = 8−12 Gyr. Even the<br />

solar system is 4.5 Gyr old and so a reduction of t gal by more than a<br />

factor of 2 is ruled out. This implies L x < L γ so that α 26 < 1.0 <strong>as</strong><br />

be<strong>for</strong>e.<br />

The galactic age constraint appears to be much more reliable than<br />

the one b<strong>as</strong>ed on the <strong>for</strong>mation rate of planetary nebulae. The <strong>for</strong>mer<br />

could be avoided if the observations reported by Liebert, Dahn, and<br />

Monet (1988) were crudely incomplete at the faint end of the luminosity<br />

function, i.e. if many faint WDs had been overlooked so that the<br />

break in the luminosity function of Fig. 2.10 were a major observational<br />

selection effect. Barring this remote possibility the limit on α 26 is conservative.<br />

Even <strong>for</strong> a much smaller value of α 26 , the inferred value <strong>for</strong><br />

t gal is reduced by an approximate factor (1 + α 26 ) −1 which may still be<br />

significant.<br />

Wang (1992) calculated numerical 1 M ⊙ WD sequences with varying<br />

amounts of pseudoscalar cooling while Blinnikov and Dunina-Barkovskaya<br />

(1994) per<strong>for</strong>med a more detailed study <strong>for</strong> 0.6 M ⊙ WDs.<br />

9 In the original derivation (Raffelt 1986b) ion correlations were ignored, leading<br />

to ⟨F ⟩ ≈ 3 and to the limit α 26 ∼<br />

< 0.3.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!