28.01.2015 Views

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Radiative Particle Decays 475<br />

Fig. 12.14. Lower limit on m ν τ γ <strong>for</strong> 200 eV ∼ < m ν ∼<br />

< 1 MeV, <strong>as</strong>suming<br />

m ν τ tot ∼<br />

> 10 10 eV s.<br />

For Dirac neutrinos the most conservative c<strong>as</strong>e is α = −1 and the<br />

temperature range relevant <strong>for</strong> ν µ and ν τ is between 6 and 8 MeV. This<br />

yields an approximately temperature independent bound of m ν τ γ ><br />

7×10 18 eV s. For Majorana neutrinos (α = 0) the limit is about 77<br />

m ν τ γ > 12×10 18 eV s. The most conservative c<strong>as</strong>e (α = −1) translates<br />

with Eq. (7.12) into<br />

µ eff < 1.6×10 −10 µ B m −1<br />

eV, (12.31)<br />

<strong>as</strong>suming m ν τ tot ∼ > 10 10 eV s. Note the different dependence on m eV<br />

relative to the low-m<strong>as</strong>s result Eq. (12.17).<br />

If m ν τ tot violates this condition because it is below 10 10 eV s means<br />

that the neutrinos decay so f<strong>as</strong>t that the photon burst effectively ends<br />

be<strong>for</strong>e the GRS integration time t GRS is over. Then the photon burst is<br />

again “short” even though the neutrino m<strong>as</strong>s is large. In this c<strong>as</strong>e one<br />

can state a limit on B γ <strong>as</strong> in Sect. 12.4.3. If τ tot is only slightly shorter<br />

so that m ν τ tot ∼ < 4×10 8 eV s, all photons arrive within t GRS = 10 s<br />

and one may directly apply Eq. (12.19), originally derived <strong>for</strong> small<br />

neutrino m<strong>as</strong>ses. For the narrow region where the photon burst ends<br />

between 10 and 223.2 s this bound must be discounted by about a<br />

factor of 2 because of the less restrictive fluence limits <strong>for</strong> the larger<br />

integration time.<br />

77 The result here is after Oberauer et al. (1993) which is similar to 6×10 18 eV s<br />

of Bludman (1992) but substantially more restrictive than 0.84×10 18 eV s of Kolb<br />

and Turner (1989). These works all refer to the isotropic c<strong>as</strong>e (α = 0).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!