28.01.2015 Views

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

158 Chapter 4<br />

The gluon in Fig. 4.13 couples to the quarks with the strong finestructure<br />

constant α s and the gluon propagator involves an effective<br />

m<strong>as</strong>s <strong>for</strong> which Anand, Goyal, and Iha (1990) used m 2 g = (6α s /π) p 2 F<br />

where p F is the Fermi momentum of the quark sea. The axion coupling<br />

to quarks is the usual derivative <strong>for</strong>m (C q /2f a ) ψ q γ µ γ 5 ψ q ∂ µ ϕ with<br />

q = u, d, s. After a cumbersome but straight<strong>for</strong>ward calculation Anand<br />

et al. found <strong>for</strong> the energy-loss rate in the degenerate limit<br />

Q a = 62π2 α 2 s<br />

945<br />

p F T 6<br />

(2f a ) 2 × {<br />

C<br />

2<br />

q (I 1 + 2I 2 ) <strong>for</strong> qq → qqa,<br />

(C 2 q + C 2 q ′) I 1 <strong>for</strong> qq ′ → qq ′ a,<br />

(4.84)<br />

where the angular integrals are<br />

I 1 ≡ 1 ∫ π ∫ 2π<br />

dθ dϕ s5 θ (1 + c 4 ϕ)<br />

2π 2 0 0 (s 2 θ s2 ϕ + κ2 ) , 2<br />

I 2 ≡ 1 ∫ π<br />

2π 2 0<br />

∫ 2π<br />

dθ dϕ<br />

0<br />

s 5 θ<br />

(s 2 θ s2 ϕ + κ2 )(s 2 θ c2 ϕ + κ2 ) , (4.85)<br />

where s θ ≡ sin(θ/2), s ϕ ≡ sin(ϕ/2), c ϕ ≡ cos(ϕ/2), and κ 2 ≡ m 2 g/2p 2 F =<br />

3α s /2π. Numerically, I 1 = 12.3, 4.23, and 2.25 <strong>for</strong> α s = 0.2, 0.4, and<br />

0.6, while I 2 = 2.34, 1.30, and 0.86, respectively.<br />

The total emission rate involves three processes with equal quarks<br />

(qq = uu, dd, ss), and three with different ones (qq ′ = ud, us, ds) so<br />

that Q a is the prefactor of Eq. (4.84) times (C 2 u + C 2 d + C 2 s )(3I 1 + 2I 2 ),<br />

to be compared with Eq. (4.10) <strong>for</strong> degenerate neutron matter. The<br />

ratio between the rates is<br />

Q qq<br />

a<br />

Q nn<br />

a<br />

= C2 u + C 2 d + C 2 s<br />

C 2 n<br />

p F,q<br />

p F,n<br />

αs<br />

2<br />

απ<br />

2<br />

2π (3I 1 + 2I 2 )<br />

G(m π /p F,n ) , (4.86)<br />

where the function G(u) w<strong>as</strong> given in Eq. (4.12). The ratio of coupling<br />

constants is model dependent (Sect. 14.3.3), the Fermi momenta are<br />

approximately equal <strong>for</strong> equal densities.<br />

For a typical value α s = 0.4 one h<strong>as</strong> α 2 s/α 2 π = 0.6×10 −3 while the l<strong>as</strong>t<br />

factor is about 140 with G = 0.7 (Fig. 4.3) so that the l<strong>as</strong>t two factors<br />

together are about 0.08. Hence, the emission rate from quark matter<br />

is much smaller than that from neutron matter because α π is so large<br />

relative to α s . In the inevitable presence of protons in a neutron star,<br />

the np process will be even more important than nn (Fig. 4.4), further<br />

enhancing the emission rate of nuclear matter relative to quark matter.<br />

For neutrino pairs the ratio of the emission rates is about the same<br />

<strong>as</strong> <strong>for</strong> axions and so quark matter is much less effective at νν emission

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!