28.01.2015 Views

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Solar Neutrinos 353<br />

While helium and metal diffusion incre<strong>as</strong>es the neutrino fluxes, the<br />

changes are roughly within the claimed errors of previous standard solar<br />

model predictions. Many improvements of input physics over the years<br />

have left the neutrino flux predictions of Bahcall and his collaborators<br />

surprisingly stable over 25 years (Bahcall 1989, 1995). Bahcall (1994)<br />

h<strong>as</strong> compiled the central temperature predictions from a heterogeneous<br />

set of 12 standard solar models without diffusion calculated by different<br />

authors since 1988. The temperature predictions are almost uni<strong>for</strong>mly<br />

distributed on the interval 15.40−15.72×10 6 K, i.e. these authors agree<br />

with each other on the value 15.56×10 6 K within ±1%.<br />

Thus, in spite of differences in detail there exists a broad consensus<br />

on what one means with a standard solar model. There<strong>for</strong>e, the neutrino<br />

fluxes of the Bahcall and Pinsonneault (1995) model with element<br />

diffusion (Tab. 10.1 and Fig. 10.1) can be taken to be representative.<br />

The general agreement on a standard solar model does not guarantee, of<br />

course, that there might not exist problems related to incorrect standard<br />

<strong>as</strong>sumptions or incorrect input parameters common to all such<br />

models.<br />

10.2.3 Uncertainties of Standard Neutrino Predictions<br />

a) Opacities<br />

In order to compare the neutrino flux predictions with the experimental<br />

me<strong>as</strong>urements one needs to develop a sense <strong>for</strong> the reliability of the<br />

calculations. Naturally, it is impossible to quantify the probability<br />

<strong>for</strong> the operation of some hitherto unknown physical effect that might<br />

spoil the predictions; an error analysis can only rely on the recognized<br />

uncertainties of standard input physics. Very detailed error analyses<br />

can be found <strong>for</strong> the standard solar models of Bahcall and Pinsonneault<br />

(1992) and of Turck-Chièze and Lopes (1993).<br />

As <strong>for</strong> solar modelling, the dominating uncertainty arises from the<br />

radiative opacities which largely determine the temperature profile of<br />

the Sun. A reduction of the Rosseland mean opacity in the central<br />

region by 10% reduces the temperature by about 1%.<br />

There is not a one-to-one correspondence between the central solar<br />

temperature T c and the neutrino fluxes because it is not possible to<br />

adjust T c and leave all else equal. Conversely, one must modify some<br />

input parameters and evolve a self-consistent solar model. Still, if one<br />

allows all input parameters to vary according to a distribution determined<br />

by their me<strong>as</strong>ured or <strong>as</strong>sumed uncertainties one finds a strong

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!